Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Bioethics and artificial intelligence: between deliberation on values and rational choice theory.
Boris Julián Pinto-Bustamante1,2,3, Julián C Riaño-Moreno1,4,5, Hernando Augusto Clavijo-Montoya1
1Bioethics Department, Bioethics, Life Sciences Research Group, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
Artificial intelligence, driven by rational choice theory, creates polarized online spaces. Algorithmic processes like filter bubbles undermine democratic deliberation by validating choices as facts and limiting diverse perspectives.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Technology Studies
- Political Science
Background:
- Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly influenced by rational choice theory and techno-liberalism.
- Large corporations and investment funds support AI development, shaping its ideological underpinnings.
- Algorithmic processes like filter bubbles and echo chambers are prevalent in AI applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically examine the theoretical foundations of artificial intelligence.
- To analyze how AI, through specific algorithmic mechanisms, impacts societal discourse and democratic processes.
- To investigate the role of corporate and financial interests in shaping AI's societal influence.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of AI's ideological basis.
- Examination of algorithmic mechanisms (filter bubbles, echo chambers) and their effects.
- Critique of AI's impact on prerequisites for democratic deliberation.
Main Results:
- AI, rooted in rational choice theory, fosters homogeneous and polarized online environments.
- Algorithmic processes reinforce existing ethical, ideological, and political narratives.
- These mechanisms validate subjective choices as objective facts, hindering critical discourse.
Conclusions:
- AI's current trajectory, influenced by techno-liberalism, contravenes essential elements of democratic deliberation.
- The distinction between data and values, dissent, and diversity are undermined by AI-driven polarization.
- Revisiting AI's foundations is crucial for preserving pluralistic societies and informed public discourse.
More Related Videos
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
07:05Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Ethics and Bioethics
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Reason and Intuition
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare: