Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Making decisions for the severely handicapped newborn.

J M Freeman

    Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
    |January 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    Standard ethical frameworks struggle with infant medical decisions, like the Baby Jane Doe case. A flexible process approach, prioritizing accurate prognosis and facts, may yield better outcomes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Rights, respect for dignity and end-of-life care: time for a change in the concept of informed consent.

    Journal of medical ethics·2009
    Same author

    Ethical theory and medical ethics: a personal perspective.

    Journal of medical ethics·2006
    Same author

    Practice parameter: evaluation of the child with global developmental delay.

    Neurology·2003
    Same author

    Hemispherectomy for intractable unihemispheric epilepsy etiology vs outcome.

    Neurology·2003
    Same author

    The postoperative course and management of 106 hemidecortications.

    Pediatric neurosurgery·2002
    Same author

    Levetiracetam psychosis in children with epilepsy.

    Epilepsia·2002

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Bioethics
    • Pediatric Decision-Making

    Background:

    • Traditional ethical decision-making models (rights, duties, beneficence) are often insufficient for complex infant cases.
    • The Baby Jane Doe case highlights the challenges in applying established ethical principles to critically ill infants.
    • Existing frameworks may not adequately address the nuances of pediatric medical decision-making.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the adequacy of standard ethical approaches in infant medical decision-making.
    • To propose an alternative process-oriented ethical framework for infant cases.
    • To emphasize the critical role of accurate prognosis and factual information in ethical infant care.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of standard ethical theories (rights, duties, beneficence, best interests).
    • Case study examination of the Baby Jane Doe situation.
    • Conceptual development of a process-based ethical approach.

    Main Results:

    • Standard ethical approaches demonstrate limitations when applied to individual infant cases.
    • A process approach, incorporating moral theory with tolerance for decision variability, appears more reasonable.
    • The necessity of high-quality medical facts and accurate prognosis is paramount for sound ethical decisions.

    Conclusions:

    • A flexible, process-driven ethical framework is needed for infant medical decision-making.
    • Decisions regarding infant care must be grounded in comprehensive medical data and reliable prognosis.
    • Judgment on specific cases, such as Baby Jane Doe, requires full access to medical records and situational context.
    Keywords:
    Baby Jane DoeDeath and EuthanasiaLong Island

    Related Experiment Videos