Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025
10:38
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
13.7K
Conflict paradigms cannot reveal competence
1Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA roman_feiman@brown.eduhttps://sites.brown.edu/bltlab/.
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|July 18, 2023
Summary
Dual-process theories face criticism regarding their exclusivity assumption. Conflict paradigms used in research may not accurately reveal how individual cognitive processes function independently.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Dual-Process Theory
Background:
- Dual-process theories propose distinct systems for cognition.
- The exclusivity assumption in these theories suggests one process excludes another.
- Criticism has been raised regarding the validity of this assumption.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the exclusivity assumption in dual-process theories.
- To identify limitations in current research paradigms used to study cognitive processes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of existing dual-process theories and their underlying assumptions.
- Examination of conflict paradigms and their inferential capabilities.
Main Results:
- The exclusivity assumption in dual-process theories is fundamentally flawed.
- Conflict paradigms offer limited insights into the independent functioning of cognitive processes.
Conclusions:
- The exclusivity assumption requires re-evaluation within dual-process frameworks.
- Alternative research methodologies may be needed to better understand individual cognitive processes.
Related Concept Videos
01:20Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
90
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
90
04:49Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
02:16Stereotype Content Model
14.8K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.8K
01:14Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
115
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
115
01:25Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
121
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
121
03:00Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K