Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Vibrotactile frequency recognition: forward and backward masking effects.

J H Kirman

    The Journal of General Psychology
    |April 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    Short, intense vibrotactile masks caused more recognition masking than long masks. Mask intensity and duration affected masking differently for forward and backward stimuli.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Working with anger in groups: a modern analytic approach.

    International journal of group psychotherapy·1995
    Same author

    Vibrotactile frequency discrimination at short durations.

    The Journal of general psychology·1986
    Same author

    A new tactile illusion: temporal limits on the processing of spatiotemporal patterns.

    The Journal of general psychology·1985
    Same author

    Forward and backward tactile recognition masking.

    The Journal of general psychology·1984
    Same author

    Tactile apparent movement: the effects of shape and type of motion.

    Perception & psychophysics·1983
    Same author

    Tactile apparent movement: the effects of number of stimulators.

    Journal of experimental psychology·1974

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Psychology
    • Sensory Perception

    Background:

    • Vibrotactile recognition involves perceiving tactile stimuli on the skin.
    • Masking occurs when one stimulus interferes with the perception of another.
    • Understanding vibrotactile masking aids in characterizing tactile sensory processing.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate forward and backward vibrotactile recognition masking.
    • To examine the effects of mask duration and intensity on masking.
    • To compare masking ranges with previous auditory masking studies.

    Main Methods:

    • Four subjects participated in the study.
    • Stimuli included 240-Hz and 160-Hz targets (20 ms duration) and 200-Hz masks.
    • Interstimulus intervals (ISIs) ranged from -500 to 500 ms.

    Main Results:

    • Short masks (20 ms) produced more masking than long masks (200 ms), except at short ISIs.
    • Increased mask intensity enhanced masking only at very short ISIs.
    • Longer mask durations increased backward masking but not forward masking.

    Conclusions:

    • Masking effects are dependent on mask duration and intensity.
    • Backward masking is more susceptible to mask duration than forward masking.
    • Vibrotactile masking shares similarities with auditory masking phenomena.

    Related Experiment Videos