Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Screening for cancer: lessons learned.

B S Hulka

    Journal of Occupational Medicine. : Official Publication of the Industrial Medical Association
    |August 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This paper clarifies cancer screening objectives, suitable disease characteristics, and effective test features. It evaluates screening program evidence, highlighting benefits and drawbacks for cervical, breast, and lung cancer.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer--collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease.

    British journal of cancer·2002
    Same author

    Breast cancer: hormones and other risk factors.

    Maturitas·2001
    Same author

    Hormone-related factors and risk of breast cancer in relation to estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status.

    American journal of epidemiology·2001
    Same author

    Meta-analyses of the relation between silicone breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue diseases.

    The New England journal of medicine·2000
    Same author

    Experience of a scientific panel formed to advise the federal judiciary on silicone breast implants.

    The New England journal of medicine·2000
    Same author

    Risk of breast cancer according to the status of HER-2/neu oncogene amplification.

    Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2000
    Same journal

    The private funding of public research. New directions in the administration of occupational and environmental health research.

    Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association·1994
    Same journal

    High-cost analysis. A closer look at the case for work-site health promotion.

    Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association·1994
    Same journal

    Teaching stress management skills to occupational and environmental health physicians and practitioners. A graduate-level practicum.

    Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association·1994
    Same journal

    Exposure to biogenic silica fibers and respiratory health in Hawaii sugarcane workers.

    Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association·1994
    Same journal

    The detection of increased amounts of the extracellular domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor in serum during carcinogenesis in asbestosis patients.

    Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association·1994
    Same journal

    Hazardous waste worker education. Long-term effects.

    Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association·1994
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Oncology
    • Public Health
    • Preventive Medicine

    Background:

    • Cancer screening programs aim to reduce morbidity and mortality.
    • Effective screening requires careful selection of diseases and tests.
    • Evaluating screening program effectiveness is crucial for public health.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To define objectives of cancer screening programs.
    • To outline characteristics of diseases and tests suitable for screening.
    • To review evidence on the advantages and disadvantages of cancer screening.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review and synthesis of evidence on cancer screening.
    • Analysis of criteria for disease suitability and test validity.
    • Case studies of cervical, breast, and lung cancer screening programs.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Diseases with high mortality, prolonged preclinical phases, and treatable early stages are suitable for screening.
    • Effective screening tests are valid, safe, acceptable, easy to perform, and cost-effective.
    • Evidence for screening benefits and harms varies across different cancer types.

    Conclusions:

    • The decision to implement or reject cancer screening requires careful consideration of disease biology, test performance, and evidence of net benefit.
    • Screening for cervical, breast, and lung cancer exemplifies the complexities in evaluating screening programs.
    • Optimizing cancer screening involves balancing potential benefits against harms and costs.