Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
Published on: March 29, 2019
Simulation vs workplace-based assessment in resuscitation: a cross-specialty descriptive analysis and comparison
Jeremy D Seed1, Stephen Gauthier2, Boris Zevin3
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Simulation-based assessment complements workplace training for rare medical skills. While faculty trust simulation for assessments, interpretation of data remains inconsistent across postgraduate programs.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Simulation-Based Learning
- Assessment in Postgraduate Training
Background:
- Simulation-based assessment offers a valuable adjunct to workplace-based assessment for Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) that are rare or challenging to evaluate.
- This study investigated the utilization of simulation for resuscitation-focused EPAs across three postgraduate medical training programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the application of simulation-based assessment for resuscitation-focused EPAs in internal medicine, emergency medicine, and surgical foundations programs.
- To explore faculty perceptions regarding the use and trustworthiness of simulation-based assessment in postgraduate medical education.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of EPA assessment data from 2017-2020 for residents in three specialties at different training stages.
- Distribution of a questionnaire to clinical competency committee members to gather insights on simulation-based assessment practices and perceptions.
Main Results:
- Simulation constituted 11% of all EPA assessments, with no significant difference in proportion across programs, except for surgical foundations between training stages.
- Entrustment scores varied between simulation and workplace settings in emergency medicine at the transition level.
- A majority of surveyed faculty (70%) trust simulation for both low-stakes (100%) and high-stakes (73%) assessments, though 45% interpret simulation data differently than workplace data.
Conclusions:
- The proportion of simulation-based assessment for resuscitation EPAs was consistent across the three postgraduate programs.
- Inconsistent interpretation of simulation-based assessment data among faculty highlights a need for standardized guidelines.
- Simulation is a trusted tool for both low- and high-stakes assessments, supporting its integration into broader assessment strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

