Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025
Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
The Difference in Scar-Related Quality of Life in Open Versus Closed Septorhinoplasty
Omar Braizat1, Nasrin Jafarian1, Dana Al-Majid1,2
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Introduction:
The open and closed techniques are the main surgical techniques to perform septorhinoplasty. Although the open technique offers a better view of the pertinent anatomy and facilitates surgical access, it creates an external scar that could affect patients' satisfaction and quality of life (QoL). This study aims to compare the open and closed techniques using the SCAR-Q patient-reported outcome measure.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, we have included patients who had their nasal surgery one year ago, in the period between April 2020 and April 2021. The SCAR-Q assessment tool to study patients' satisfaction with appearance, symptoms, and psychological impact of open and closed septorhinoplasty techniques.
Results:
A total of 77 patients were included in this analysis. Of these, 39 (50.6%) patients underwent a closed septorhinoplasty, and 38 (49.4%) patients underwent an open approach. The mean (SD) age was 29.6 (8.1) years, and most patients were females (59.7%). The overall SCAR-Q questionnaire responses were very positive across all scales in our cohort, the median (IQR) scores were 91.0 (73.0-100.0) for the appearance scale, 89.0 (70.0-100.0) for the symptoms scale, and 100.0 (87.0-100.0) for the psychological impact scale. However, we have found no differences in SCAR-Q scores regarding appearance, symptoms, and psychological impact between open and closed septorhinoplasty.
Conclusion:
We have found no significant differences in QoL between open and closed techniques of septorhinoplasty. Larger studies are needed to further validate this finding.
