Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Clinician Interruptions and Patient-Rated Clinician Empathy in Specialty Visits
S Ryan Pierson1, Ryan Lam, Marielle Ngoue
1From the Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas, Austin, TX.
Introduction:
Clinicians tend to interrupt patients when they are describing their problem, which may contribute to feeling unheard or misunderstood. Using transcripts of audio and video recordings from musculoskeletal (MSK) specialty visits, we asked what factors are associated with (1) Perceived clinician empathy, including the time a patient spends describing the problem and time to the first interruption, (2) duration of patient symptom description, and (3) duration between the end of greeting and first nonactive listening interruption.
Methods:
We analyzed transcripts of 194 adult patients seeking MSK specialty care with a median age (Interquartile range [IQR]) of 47 (33 to 59) years. Participants completed postvisit measures of perceived clinician empathy, symptoms of depression, accommodation of pain, and health anxiety. A nonactive listening interruption was defined as the clinician unilaterally redirecting the topic of conversation. Factors associated with patient-rated clinician empathy, patient problem description duration, and time until the first nonactive listening interruption were sought in bivariate and multivariable analyses.
Results:
The patient's narrative was interrupted at least one time in 144 visits (74%). The duration of each visit was a median of 12 minutes (IQR 9 to 16 minutes). The median time patients spent describing their symptoms was 139 seconds before the first interruption (IQR 84 to 225 seconds). The median duration between the end of the initial greeting and the first interruption was 60 seconds (IQR 30 to 103 seconds). Clinician interruption was associated with shorter duration of symptom description. Greater perceived clinician empathy was associated with greater accommodation of pain (regression coefficient [95% confidence interval] = 0.015 [0.0005-0.30]; P = 0.04).
Discussion:
Clinician interruption was associated with shorter symptom presentation, but not with diminished perception of clinician empathy. Although active listening and avoidance of interruption are important communication tactics, other aspects of the patient-clinician relationship may have more effect on patient experience.
Insights
Clinicians often interrupt patients, shortening symptom descriptions but not reducing perceived empathy. Other factors beyond active listening may influence patient experience in musculoskeletal care.
Area of Science:
- Medical Communication
- Patient Experience
- Musculoskeletal (MSK) Care
Background:
- Clinician interruptions during patient problem descriptions can lead to patients feeling unheard.
- Effective communication is crucial for patient satisfaction and understanding in healthcare settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate factors associated with perceived clinician empathy in musculoskeletal (MSK) specialty visits.
- To analyze the duration of patient symptom description and the timing of clinician interruptions.
- To determine the relationship between clinician interruptions and patient-reported outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 194 audio/video transcripts from adult MSK specialty visits.
- Measurement of perceived clinician empathy, symptom duration, and time to first interruption.
- Bivariate and multivariable analyses to identify associated factors.
Main Results:
- 74% of visits included at least one clinician interruption.
- Clinician interruptions were associated with shorter patient symptom description durations (median 139 seconds).
- Greater perceived clinician empathy correlated with increased pain accommodation.
Conclusions:
- While clinician interruptions shorten patient explanations, they do not appear to diminish perceived empathy.
- Factors beyond active listening and interruption avoidance may significantly impact the patient-clinician relationship and overall patient experience.
More Related Videos
05:04Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Patient-centered Care
Ethics and Bioethics