Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The cervical cap for home artificial insemination.

S L Corson, F R Batzer, C Otis

    The Journal of Reproductive Medicine
    |May 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Quantitative sensory testing in canine musculoskeletal pain: Findings from a systematic review, meta-analysis feasibility assessment, and limitations.

    Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2024
    Same author

    Quantitative sensory testing in feline osteoarthritic pain - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2020
    Same author

    Assessing experimental visceral pain in dairy cattle: A pilot, prospective, blinded, randomized, and controlled study focusing on spinal pain proteomics.

    Journal of dairy science·2014
    Same author

    Hysterectomy, endometrial ablation and Mirena® for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis.

    Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2011
    Same author

    Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for heavy menstrual bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from individual patients.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2010
    Same author

    An autosomal dominant ataxia maps to 19q13: Allelic heterogeneity of SCA13 or novel locus?

    Neurology·2005

    The cervical cap facilitated artificial insemination for 63 couples, achieving a 44% pregnancy rate with sustained use. No significant difference in conception rates was observed compared to those conceiving without intervention.

    Area of Science:

    • Reproductive medicine
    • Contraception and fertility control

    Background:

    • Artificial insemination (AI) offers a method for conception.
    • Home-based AI can increase accessibility and reduce costs.
    • The cervical cap is a barrier contraceptive device.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the effectiveness of the cervical cap as a device for home-based artificial insemination (husband).
    • To determine pregnancy rates associated with cervical cap use in AI programs.

    Main Methods:

    • Sixty-three couples utilized the cervical cap for husband-originated artificial insemination in a home setting.
    • Pregnancy rates were analyzed based on duration of use and compared to a control group.

    Main Results:

    Keywords:
    AmericasArtificial InseminationBarrier MethodsCervical CapClinical ResearchContraceptionContraceptive MethodsDemographic FactorsDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesFamily PlanningFertilityFertility MeasurementsInfertilityNorth AmericaNorthern AmericaPopulationPopulation DynamicsPregnancy RateReproductionReproductive TechnologiesResearch MethodologyResearch ReportUnited StatesVaginal Barrier Methods

    Related Experiment Videos

  • An overall pregnancy rate of 19% was observed.
  • Couples using the cervical cap for at least six months or until pregnancy achieved a 44% pregnancy rate.
  • No statistically significant difference in pregnancy rates was found between the AI program participants and those who conceived spontaneously after discontinuing the program.

    • Conclusions:

    • The cervical cap can be an effective adjunct in home-based artificial insemination programs, particularly with consistent, longer-term use.
    • The study suggests that the cervical cap may not offer a significant advantage over natural conception for couples undergoing AI.
    • Further research could explore patient factors influencing success rates in cervical cap-assisted AI.