Sacubitril/valsartan effects on arrhythmias and left ventricular remodelling in heart failure: An observational study
Mauro Acquaro1, Laura Scelsi2, Beatrice Pasotti1
1Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Corso Strada Nuova, 65, Pavia, Italy; Division of Cardiology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Insights
Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) and increased biventricular pacing in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. However, PVC reduction did not correlate with reverse cardiac remodeling.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Conflicting literature exists on sacubitril/valsartan's antiarrhythmic effects in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- Evaluating long-term impacts on arrhythmic burden and cardiac remodeling is crucial for HFrEF management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the long-term effects of sacubitril/valsartan on arrhythmic burden in HFrEF patients.
- To investigate the correlation between reduced premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) and reverse cardiac remodeling during follow-up.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 255 HFrEF patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan was analyzed.
- 24-hour Holter-ECG or ICD interrogation and echocardiography were performed at baseline, 12, and 24 months.
- Cardiac-related hospitalizations were compared pre-treatment and during follow-up.
Main Results:
- Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced the global burden of 24-hour PVCs at 12 and 24 months.
- Biventricular pacing increased significantly in patients with biventricular ICDs.
- No significant correlation was found between PVC reduction and left ventricular reverse remodeling (LV-ESVi or LVEF).
- Heart failure-related hospitalizations decreased significantly during follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Sacubitril/valsartan effectively reduced PVCs and increased biventricular pacing in HFrEF patients on optimal therapy.
- The observed PVC reduction did not correlate with reverse left ventricular remodeling.
- Further research is needed to elucidate potential direct antiarrhythmic mechanisms of sacubitril/valsartan.
Aims:
Conflicting results have been reported in the literature on the potential antiarrhythmic effect of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The objectives of this study were: 1- to evaluate the long term effects of sacubitril/valsartan on arrhythmic burden in HFrEF patients; 2- to evaluate the correlation between the reduction of premature ventricular complexes during f-up and reverse remodelling.
Methods:
We identified 255 consecutive HFrEF patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan between March 2017 and May 2020 and followed by the Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant Unit of IRCCS San Matteo Hospital in Pavia (Italy). Within this subgroup, 153 patients underwent 24 h-Holter-ECG or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) interrogation at baseline, at 12 months (t1) and at 24 months (t2) and transthoracic echocardiography at baseline and after 12 months after the beginning of sacubitril/valsartan. Cardiac-related hospitalizations were analyzed in the 12 months preceding and during 24 months following the drug starting date.
Results:
Global burden of 24-h premature ventricular complexes (PVC) was significantly reduced at 12 months (t1) and at 24 months (t2) as compared to the same period before treatment (1043 [304-3360] vs 768 [82-2784] at t1 vs 114 [9-333] at t2, P = 0.000). In the subgroup of patients implanted with biventricular ICD (n = 30), the percentage of biventricular pacing increased significantly (96% [94-99] vs 98% [96-99] at t1 vs 98%[97-100] at t2; P = 0.027). The burden of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia and sustained ventricular tachycardia did not change from baseline to t1 and t2, but a reduction of patients with at least one ICD appropriate shock was reported. The correlations between reduction in 24 h PVC and reduction in LV-ESVi or improvement in LVEF were not statistically significant (respectively R = 0.144, P = 0.197 and R = -0.190, P = 0.074). Heart failure related hospitalizations decreased during follow up (11.1% in the year before treatment vs 4.6% at t1 and 4.6% at t2; P = 0.040).
Conclusion:
Sacubitril/valsartan reduced the number of premature ventricular complexes and increased the percentage of biventricular pacing in a cohort of HFrEF patients already on optimal medical therapy. PVC reduction did not correlate with reverse left ventricular remodelling. Whether sacubitril/valsartan has any direct antiarrhythmic effects is an issue to be better explored in future studies.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies


