Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Acetylcholine Re-Challenge After Intracoronary Nitroglycerine Administration
Published on: April 4, 2022
Complete Revascularization and Angina-Related Health Status in the ISCHEMIA Trial
Kreton Mavromatis1, Philip G Jones2, Ziad A Ali3
1Emory University, Atlanta VA Healthcare System, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Insights
Complete revascularization (CR) significantly improves health status in chronic coronary disease (CCD) patients, especially those with frequent angina. Both anatomic and functional CR offer comparable quality of life benefits compared to incomplete revascularization or conservative management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Health Outcomes Research
Background:
- The impact of complete revascularization (CR) on health status in chronic coronary disease (CCD) remains understudied.
- Existing research lacks comprehensive data on CR's effect on symptoms, function, and quality of life.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of CR versus incomplete revascularization (ICR) on health status in CCD patients.
- To compare the predicted impact of achieving CR in all invasive strategy patients versus conservative management.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the ISCHEMIA trial, comparing invasive (INV) versus conservative (CON) management.
- Multivariable regression and propensity-weighted modeling to assess health status at 12 months post-intervention.
- Independent core laboratory assessment of CR and incomplete revascularization (ICR).
Main Results:
- Complete revascularization (CR) was achieved in 43.3% (anatomic) and 57.8% (functional) of invasive patients.
- CR was associated with improved angina frequency compared to ICR.
- Modeled CR and ICR in all invasive patients showed greater health status improvements than conservative management, with CR showing superior outcomes, particularly for patients with baseline frequent angina.
Conclusions:
- Complete revascularization (CR) improves health status in chronic coronary disease (CCD) patients more than incomplete revascularization (ICR) or conservative (CON) management.
- Benefits of CR are most significant in patients experiencing frequent angina.
- Anatomic and functional CR yield comparable improvements in quality of life.
Background:
The impact of complete revascularization (CR) on angina-related health status (symptoms, function, quality of life) in chronic coronary disease (CCD) has not been well studied.
Objectives:
Among patients with CCD randomized to invasive (INV) vs conservative (CON) management in ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches), we compared the following: 1) the impact of anatomic and functional CR on health status compared with incomplete revascularization (ICR); and 2) the predicted impact of achieving CR in all INV patients compared with CON.
Methods:
Multivariable regression adjusting for patient characteristics was used to compare 12-month health status after independent core laboratory-defined CR vs ICR in INV patients who underwent revascularization. Propensity-weighted modeling was then performed to estimate the treatment effect had CR or ICR been achieved in all INV patients, compared with CON.
Results:
Anatomic and functional CR were achieved in 43.3% and 57.8% of 1,641 INV patients, respectively. Among revascularized patients, CR was associated with improved Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency compared with ICR after adjustment for baseline differences. After modeling CR and ICR in all INV patients, patients with CR and ICR each had greater improvements in health status than CON, with better health status with CR than ICR. The projected benefits of CR were most pronounced in patients with baseline daily/weekly angina and not seen in those with no angina.
Conclusions:
Among patients with CCD in ISCHEMIA, health status improved more with CR compared with ICR or CON, particularly in those with frequent angina. Anatomic and functional CR provided comparable improvements in quality of life. (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches [ISCHEMIA]; NCT01471522).
Related Concept Videos
Angina IV: Management
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina II: Classification
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment

