Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Compressive and shear behaviour of high-water quick-setting material modified collapsible loess subgrade.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

An In Vitro Investigation of the Impact of Ultrasound Induced-Streaming Motions on the Flow Inside Lateral Features of the Root Canal.

International endodontic journal·2025
Same author

Multi-Scale Oriented Detection with Shared Convolution for UAV-Enabled Maritime Safety Surveillance.

Research (Washington, D.C.)·2025
Same author

Electrochemical Biosensor for Rapid Detection of Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplants.

Advanced healthcare materials·2025
Same author

Mass Spectrometry Imaging Reveals That Gold Nanomaterial Surface Chemistry Affects Transport and Excretion in Mice over Time.

Chemical & biomedical imaging·2025
Same author

Acoustophoretic system for seed separation on conveyor belts.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Quantitative Characterization of Liquid Photosensitive Bioink Properties for Continuous Digital Light Processing Based Printing
04:32

Author Spotlight: Quantitative Characterization of Liquid Photosensitive Bioink Properties for Continuous Digital Light Processing Based Printing

Published on: April 14, 2023

965

Machine Learning in Predicting Printable Biomaterial Formulations for Direct Ink Writing.

Hongyi Chen1,2, Yuanchang Liu1,1, Stavroula Balabani1,3

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.

Research (Washington, D.C.)
|July 20, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Artificial intelligence, including machine learning algorithms, can predict the printability of 3D biomaterials. This approach accelerates the development of custom 3D printed biomedical devices, reducing trial-and-error methods.

More Related Videos

Automated Robotic Dispensing Technique for Surface Guidance and Bioprinting of Cells
10:14

Automated Robotic Dispensing Technique for Surface Guidance and Bioprinting of Cells

Published on: November 18, 2016

7.3K
Fabrication of a Crystalline Nanocellulose Embedded Agarose Biomaterial Ink for Bone Marrow-Derived Mast Cell Culture
09:32

Fabrication of a Crystalline Nanocellulose Embedded Agarose Biomaterial Ink for Bone Marrow-Derived Mast Cell Culture

Published on: May 11, 2021

3.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Quantitative Characterization of Liquid Photosensitive Bioink Properties for Continuous Digital Light Processing Based Printing
04:32

Author Spotlight: Quantitative Characterization of Liquid Photosensitive Bioink Properties for Continuous Digital Light Processing Based Printing

Published on: April 14, 2023

965
Automated Robotic Dispensing Technique for Surface Guidance and Bioprinting of Cells
10:14

Automated Robotic Dispensing Technique for Surface Guidance and Bioprinting of Cells

Published on: November 18, 2016

7.3K
Fabrication of a Crystalline Nanocellulose Embedded Agarose Biomaterial Ink for Bone Marrow-Derived Mast Cell Culture
09:32

Fabrication of a Crystalline Nanocellulose Embedded Agarose Biomaterial Ink for Bone Marrow-Derived Mast Cell Culture

Published on: May 11, 2021

3.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Materials Science
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Three-dimensional (3D) printing offers patient-specific customization in biomedical engineering.
  • Current biomaterial ink development relies on time-consuming trial-and-error methods.
  • Expert knowledge is often required to navigate complex formulation variables.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop predictive models for biomaterial printability using machine learning (ML).
  • To accelerate and optimize the development of 3D printable biomaterial formulations.
  • To guide the selection of materials and solvents for specific 3D printing applications.

Main Methods:

  • Constructed and evaluated ML algorithms: decision tree, random forest (RF), and deep learning (DL).
  • 3D printed 210 formulations comprising 16 bioactive/smart materials and 4 solvents.
  • Assessed printability of each formulation and trained ML models on experimental data.

Main Results:

  • All ML algorithms successfully predicted biomaterial ink printability.
  • The RF algorithm demonstrated the highest accuracy (88.1%), precision (90.6%), and F1 score (87.0%).
  • Deep learning generated a printability map with finer granularity, aiding ink development.

Conclusions:

  • ML provides an effective and novel strategy for developing 3D printable biomaterials.
  • Predictive modeling significantly enhances the efficiency of biomaterial ink formulation.
  • This approach supports the advancement of custom 3D printed biomedical applications.