Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Ivabradine effects in hospitalized acute heart failure patients: a single center retrospective study
Mahmoud Abdelnabi1, Juthipong Benjanuwattra1, Yehia Saleh2
1Internal Medicine Department, Texas Tech University Health Science Center Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Insights
Ivabradine use in acute decompensated heart failure patients did not reduce rehospitalization or mortality. However, it was associated with a lower average heart rate and shorter hospital stay.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Increased heart rate (HR) is detrimental in decompensated heart failure (DHF).
- Ivabradine is approved for chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- Limited data exists on ivabradine's efficacy and safety in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of ivabradine on morbidity and short-term mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients.
- To evaluate ivabradine's impact on heart rate and length of hospital stay.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective observational study of 998 ADHF patients on guideline-directed treatment, including beta-blockers.
- Patients were divided into two groups: beta-blocker alone (No-ivabradine) or beta-blocker plus ivabradine.
- Propensity matching was used to control for confounding factors; patients with hemodynamic instability were excluded.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in baseline characteristics, laboratory, or echocardiographic data between groups.
- Ivabradine group showed significantly lower average HR (87 ± 15 bpm vs. 90 ± 12 bpm) and shorter hospital stay (5.3 ± 2.3 days vs. 7.7 ± 5.6 days).
- No significant differences in rehospitalization or mortality rates at 1- and 6-month follow-ups.
Conclusions:
- Ivabradine use in hospitalized ADHF patients was linked to reduced average HR and length of hospital stay.
- Ivabradine did not demonstrate a benefit in reducing rehospitalization or mortality rates at 1- and 6-month follow-ups.
Background:
An increased heart rate (HR) is deleterious in patients with decompensated heart failure. Ivabradine, an HR lowering agent which acts by inhibiting the If current in the sinoatrial node, is indicated for chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, data regarding the safety and efficacy of ivabradine in acute decompensated heart failure is limited. This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the effects of ivabradine on morbidity and short-term mortality of hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure.
Methods:
A total of 998 patients with acute decompensated heart failure on top of a chronic status from 1/5/2014 to 1/5/2019 who were already on guideline-directed treatment including a beta-blocker were included. Patients were divided into two groups, the first group (No-ivabradine) where patients continued the same dose of beta-blocker alone while the second group (ivabradine group) ivabradine 5 mg BID was added in addition to the same dose of beta-blocker. Patients with hemodynamic instabilities were excluded from the study. Propensity matching was performed to exclude confounding factors.
Results:
There was no significant difference between groups regarding baseline patient characteristics, laboratory, and echocardiographic data. There were significant differences between groups regarding average HR (87 ± 15 and 90 ± 12 bpm in ivabradine and control groups, consecutively, P = 0.0006*) and length of hospital stay (5.3 ± 2.3 and 7.7 ± 5.6 days in ivabradine and control groups, consecutively, P < 0.0001*). However, there were no differences in rehospitalization and mortality rates at 1 month and 6 months.
Conclusion:
In a retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the effects of ivabradine on morbidity and short-term mortality of hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Ivabradine was associated with significantly lower average HR and length of hospital stay. However, there was no benefit in the reduction of rehospitalization and mortality rates at 1- and 6-month follow-ups.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
07:39Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics