Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Simulating Subject-Specific Aortic Hemodynamic Effects of Valvular Lesions in Rheumatic Heart Disease
Hannah L Cebull1, Olukayode O Aremu2, Radhika S Kulkarni3
1Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907; Cape Heart Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa; Cape Universities Body Imaging Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, South Africa; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322.
Abstract:
Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a neglected tropical disease despite the substantial global health burden. In this study, we aimed to develop a lower cost method of modeling aortic blood flow using subject-specific velocity profiles, aiding our understanding of RHD's consequences on the structure and function of the ascending aorta. Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) are often used for diagnosis, including valve dysfunction assessments. However, there is a need to further characterize aortic valve lesions to improve treatment options and timing for patients, while using accessible and affordable imaging strategies. Here, we simulated effects of RHD aortic valve lesions on the aorta using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). We hypothesized that inlet velocity distribution and wall shear stress (WSS) will differ between RHD and non-RHD individuals, as well as between subject-specific and standard Womersley velocity profiles. Phase-contrast CMR data from South Africa of six RHD subjects with aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation and six matched controls were used to estimate subject-specific velocity inlet profiles and the mean velocity for Womersley profiles. Our findings were twofold. First, we found WSS in subject-specific RHD was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than control subject simulations, while Womersley simulation groups did not differ. Second, evaluating spatial velocity differences (ΔSV) between simulation types revealed that simulations of RHD had significantly higher ΔSV than non-RHD (p < 0.05), these results highlight the need for implementing subject-specific input into RHD CFD, which we demonstrate how to accomplish through accessible methods.
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction

