Formulation and optimization of theophylline-loaded enteric-coated spanlastic nanovesicles for colon delivery; Ameliorate acetic acid-induced ulcerative colitis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 22, 2025

A Facile and Efficient Approach for the Production of Reversible Disulfide Cross-linked Micelles
Published on: December 23, 2016
Elsaied H Barakat1, Mohamed A Akl2, Mohamed F Ibrahim1
1Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract:
Treatment of colon diseases presents one of the most significant obstacles to drug delivery due to the inability to deliver sufficient drug concentration selectively to the colon. The goal of the proposed study was to develop, optimize, and assess an effective colon target delivery system of theophylline-based nanovesicles (TP-NVs) surrounded by a biodegradable polymeric shell of chitosan (CS) and Eudragit L100 (EL100) for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). TP-loaded nanovesicles were fabricated using the ethanol injection method and coated with CS and EL100, respectively. We used a 32-factorial design approach to optimize the concentration of CS and EL100 to minimize particle size (PS) and maximize the cumulative amount of theophylline released (CTR) after 24 h. The optimized formulation was described using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and in vitro release. In-vivo quantification of theophylline in the gastrointestinal tract and in-vivo targeting potential in a rat model of acetic acid-induced colitis were also thoroughly evaluated. The characteristics of the optimal formula predicted by the 32-factorial design approach corresponded exceptionally well with the measured PS of 271.3 nm, the zeta potential of -39.9 mV, and CTR of 3.95, and a 99.93% after 5 and 24 h, respectively. Notably, the in vivo results in the rat model of colitis showed that the formulation with an optimized coat significantly improved theophylline distribution to the colon and markedly decreased the expression of interleukin-6 and ulcerative lesions compared to a pure theophylline solution. These outcomes elucidated the feasibility of a 32-factorial design to detect the crucial interactions between the study's components. Our findings suggested that enteric-coated nanovesicles formulations with optimal coat compositions of 0.2693% (w/v) and 0.75% (w/v) of CS and EL100, respectively, were promising carriers for colonic delivery of theophylline, a rate-limiting step in the treatment of UC.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in IBD
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Prostaglandin Analogs as Mucosal Protective Agents
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can induce peptic ulcers by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, decreasing...
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Sucralfate as Mucosal Protective Agents
In this scenario, mucosal protective agents like sucralfate play an essential role. Sucralfate, a complex of sulfated sucrose and aluminum hydroxide, demonstrates its usefulness in acidic conditions,...
Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current...
Factors Affecting Dissolution: Drug Permeability, Stability and Stereochemistry
Routes of Drug Administration: Enteral
Enteral administration involves drug administration via the mouth in two ways: orally or sublingually.
Unlike sublingually drugs, drugs that are taken orally pass through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and get metabolized by the liver. Once metabolized, the drug is absorbed into the systemic circulation, reaching different body parts via the bloodstream. However, while passing through the stomach,...

