Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 22, 2025
Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
Published on: June 7, 2024
Accuracy and Precision of 3-dimensional Optical Imaging for Body Composition by Age, BMI, and Ethnicity
Michael C Wong1, Jonathan P Bennett1, Brandon Quon2
1Department of Epidemiology, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, United States; Department of Human Nutrition, Food and Animal Sciences, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, United States.
Background:
The obesity epidemic brought a need for accessible methods to monitor body composition, as excess adiposity has been associated with cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, and some cancers. Recent 3-dimensional optical (3DO) imaging advancements have provided opportunities for assessing body composition. However, the accuracy and precision of an overall 3DO body composition model in specific subgroups are unknown.
Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate 3DO's accuracy and precision by subgroups of age, body mass index, and ethnicity.
Methods:
A cross-sectional analysis was performed using data from the Shape Up! Adults study. Each participant received duplicate 3DO and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. 3DO meshes were digitally registered and reposed using Meshcapade. Principal component analysis was performed on 3DO meshes. The resulting principal components estimated DXA whole-body and regional body composition using stepwise forward linear regression with 5-fold cross-validation. Duplicate 3DO and DXA scans were used for test-retest precision. Student's t tests were performed between 3DO and DXA by subgroup to determine significant differences.
Results:
Six hundred thirty-four participants (females = 346) had completed the study at the time of the analysis. 3DO total fat mass in the entire sample achieved R2 of 0.94 with root mean squared error (RMSE) of 2.91 kg compared to DXA in females and similarly in males. 3DO total fat mass achieved a % coefficient of variation (RMSE) of 1.76% (0.44 kg), whereas DXA was 0.98% (0.24 kg) in females and similarly in males. There were no mean differences for total fat, fat-free, percent fat, or visceral adipose tissue by age group (P > 0.068). However, there were mean differences for underweight, Asian, and Black females as well as Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islanders (P < 0.038).
Conclusions:
A single 3DO body composition model produced accurate and precise body composition estimates that can be used on diverse populations. However, adjustments to specific subgroups may be warranted to improve the accuracy in those that had significant differences. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03637855 (Shape Up! Adults).
