Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Responsiveness of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure-Haemorrhoidal Impact and Satisfaction Score in patients with
Sara Z Kuiper1, Carmen D Dirksen2, Litza Mitalas3
1Department of Surgery, Maastricht University, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Aim:
In this study we aimed to assess the responsiveness of the symptom score of the recently developed Patient-Reported Outcome Measure-Haemorrhoidal Impact and Satisfaction Score (PROM-HISS). Furthermore, the minimally relevant difference (MRD) was determined.
Method:
The responsiveness of PROM-HISS was tested using a criterion-based (i.e. anchor) and construct-based (i.e. hypotheses testing) approach. Patients with haemorrhoidal disease (HD) completed the PROM-HISS before and 1 week after treatment in hospital. A global self-assessment of change question (SCQ) was administered 1-week after treatment and functioned as the criterion. The following analyses were performed: (1) correlation between the PROM-HISS symptom score and the criterion (SCQ) and (2) hypotheses testing. The MRD was determined as change in symptoms of the subgroup reporting 'somewhat fewer complaints' on the SCQ.
Results:
Between February and August 2022, 94 patients with grade II-IV HD from three hospitals were included. The correlation between the SCQ and a change on the PROM-HISS symptom score was 0.595 indicating that an improvement on the SCQ corresponds to an improvement on the PROM-HISS symptom score. As hypothesized, the mean change in PROM-HISS scores was significantly different between subgroups of patients based on their SCQ responses. Patients reporting a small change in HD symptoms on the SCQ corresponded to a mean change of 0.3 on the PROM-HISS symptom score.
Conclusion:
The PROM-HISS symptom score is a responsive instrument as it identifies change in HD symptoms because of treatment. The estimated MRD of 0.3 can be used to inform clinical research and practice.
More Related Videos
02:28Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
Published on: March 1, 2024
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems related to...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...