A retrospective, comparative, clinical study of occlusion rate of peripherally inserted central catheters fabricated

Joseph Bunch1, Brian Hanley2, Daniel Donahue2

  • 1ProVasc Solutions, LTD. Vascular Access Group, Romeoville, IL, USA. admin@picclines.net.

Insights

New hydrophilic biomaterial (HBM) peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) significantly reduced catheter occlusion compared to standard thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) devices. This innovation offers a promising solution to a common and costly complication in vascular access.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Vascular Access Devices
  • Thrombosis Research

Background:

  • Catheter occlusion is a frequent complication of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs).
  • Thrombotic accumulation on vascular access devices stems from blood protein interactions.
  • Hydrophilic materials are known to possess antithrombotic properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the incidence of catheter occlusion between PICCs made of hydrophilic biomaterial (HBM) and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU).

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study was conducted on 121 patients requiring PICCs.
  • 60 patients received HBM PICCs, and 61 patients received TPU PICCs.
  • Catheter occlusion occurrences were reviewed for both groups.

Main Results:

  • No occlusions (0.0%) were observed in the HBM PICC group (n=60).
  • Catheter occlusions occurred in 13.2% of the TPU PICC group (n=61).
  • The difference in occlusion rates was statistically significant (p=0.001).

Conclusions:

  • HBM PICCs demonstrate a significant reduction in catheter occlusion compared to TPU PICCs.
  • The extreme hydrophilicity of HBM may be responsible for its antithrombotic effect.
  • This finding suggests HBM could improve patient outcomes by minimizing PICC-related complications.

Related Concept Videos