Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

1.3K
Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
1.3K
In-vitro Mutagenesis01:16

In-vitro Mutagenesis

14.0K
To learn more about the function of a gene, researchers can observe what happens when the gene is inactivated or “knocked out,” by creating genetically engineered knockout animals. Knockout mice have been particularly useful as models for human diseases such as cancer, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes.
14.0K
Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

4.9K
Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
4.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

AmesFormer: State-of-the-Art Mutagenicity Prediction with Graph Transformers.

Chemical research in toxicology·2025
Same author

Deus Ex Machina? The Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Toxicology.

Chemical research in toxicology·2024
Same author

Evaluation of QSAR models for predicting mutagenicity: outcome of the Second Ames/QSAR international challenge project.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2023
Same author

Multiple Instance Learning Improves Ames Mutagenicity Prediction for Problematic Molecular Species.

Chemical research in toxicology·2023
Same author

An Open Drug Discovery Competition: Experimental Validation of Predictive Models in a Series of Novel Antimalarials.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2021
Same author

LogP prediction performance with the SMD solvation model and the M06 density functional family for SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge molecules.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 22, 2025

Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Based Developmental Toxicity Assays for Chemical Safety Screening and Systems Biology Data Generation
17:28

Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Based Developmental Toxicity Assays for Chemical Safety Screening and Systems Biology Data Generation

Published on: June 17, 2015

12.7K

Mechanistic Task Groupings Enhance Multitask Deep Learning of Strain-Specific Ames Mutagenicity.

Raymond Lui1, Davy Guan1, Slade Matthews1

  • 1Computational Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Chemical Research in Toxicology
|July 21, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study shows that grouping tasks in multitask deep learning improves Ames mutagenicity prediction accuracy. Incorporating toxicology knowledge enhances multitask QSAR models for better chemical safety assessments.

More Related Videos

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice
08:35

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

12.3K
Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
08:27

Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Published on: September 2, 2021

4.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 22, 2025

Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Based Developmental Toxicity Assays for Chemical Safety Screening and Systems Biology Data Generation
17:28

Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Based Developmental Toxicity Assays for Chemical Safety Screening and Systems Biology Data Generation

Published on: June 17, 2015

12.7K
An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice
08:35

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

12.3K
Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
08:27

Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Published on: September 2, 2021

4.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computational toxicology
  • Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling
  • Deep learning in cheminformatics

Background:

  • The Ames test is a standard assay for detecting chemical mutagens.
  • Multitask deep learning can enhance QSAR model performance by jointly training related tasks.
  • Integrating domain knowledge into multitask learning can optimize predictive accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of toxicology-informed task groupings on multitask deep learning for Ames mutagenicity prediction.
  • To compare the performance of grouped versus ungrouped multitask models against single-task controls.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized 16 Salmonella typhimurium strain tasks from the Ames test.
  • Developed multitask neural networks, both with and without task groupings based on mechanistic correlations.
  • Employed correlation data analysis to inform task grouping strategies.

Main Results:

  • Both grouped and ungrouped multitask models outperformed single-task controls in predicting Ames mutagenicity.
  • Grouped multitask models consistently showed incremental performance gains over ungrouped models.
  • Mechanistic task groupings enhanced synergistic training signals.

Conclusions:

  • Multitask learning provides a significant performance boost for Ames mutagenicity prediction.
  • Toxicology domain knowledge, used for task grouping, further refines multitask QSAR models.
  • This approach leads to more transparent and accurate mutagenicity predictions.