Microelectrode evaluation of in situ oxidant reactivity and pH variability at new ductile iron and copper coupon...

Thirty-two short term (∼7.5 h) abiotic experiments were conducted with new ductile iron and copper coupons exposed to various water qualities, including pH (7 or 9), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC, 10 or 50 mg C L^-1) and phosphate (0 or 3 mg P L^-1) concentrations and 4 mg Cl₂ L^-1 free chlorine or monochloramine. To quantify oxidant reactivity with the new metal coupons, microelectrodes were used to obtain oxidant (free chlorine or monochloramine and dissolved oxygen (DO)) concentration and pH microprofiles from the bulk water to near the metal coupon surface. From the microprofiles, apparent surface reaction rate constants (k) were determined for each oxidant. An ANOVA analysis evaluated if the five variables (Material, Oxidant, Phosphate, DIC, and pH) significantly affected estimates of k, finding that the Material and Oxidant variables and their interaction were statistically significant (p<0.05), but the effect of variables of Phosphate, DIC, and pH on k values were not significant in this study. In general, both ductile iron and copper coupons showed significant surface reactivity towards free chlorine and monochloramine. For ductile iron, DO consumption was greater than for copper, which showed minimal DO reactivity, and DO was less reactive towards the copper surface than either free chlorine or monochloramine. Furthermore, pH microprofiles provided insight into the complexity that might exist near corroding metal surfaces where the bulk water pH may be substantially different from that measured near metal surfaces which is significant as pH is a controlling variable in terms of scale formation and metal solubility. This study represents an important first step towards using microelectrodes to (1) understand and provide direct measurement of oxidant microprofiles from the bulk water to the metal surface; (2) determine pipe wall reactivity using the directly measured concentrations profiles versus estimated pipe wall reactivity from bulk water measurements, and (3) understand how variables measured by bulk water samples (e.g., pH) may be drastically different from what is occurring at and near the metal surface. Together, these insights will assist in understanding disinfectant residual maintenance, corrosion, and metal release.