Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 22, 2025

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
Published on: July 25, 2014
Characterization of Photothermal Desorption-Compatible Diffusive Samplers for Volatile Organic Compounds
Jacob S Shedd1, Jonghwa Oh1, Evan L Floyd2
1Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 65233, United States.
Abstract:
Products and starting materials containing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can easily be found in a variety of businesses, making them a common source of occupational exposure. To prevent negative impacts on employee health, field industrial hygienists must conduct regular sampling to ensure exposures remain below the regulatory limits set by governmental and professional associations. As such, the need for sensitive and reliable exposure assessment techniques becomes evident. Over the preceding decade, the industrial hygiene research group at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) has been working on the development of an emerging, preanalytical technique known as photothermal desorption (PTD) to improve upon the analytical sensitivity of currently employed methods. PTD's novel design uses pulses of high-energy light to desorb analytes from thermally conductive, carbonaceous sorbents, to be delivered to downstream analytical detectors. Since PTD's conception, the theoretical framework and advances in sorbent fabrication have been investigated; however, further work is needed to produce a field-ready sampling device for use with PTD. As such, objectives of the present work were to design a PTD-compatible diffusive sampler prototype and characterize the prototype's sampling efficiencies for toluene, n-hexane, trichloroethylene, and isopropyl alcohol. In pursuit of these objectives, the study empirically quantified the sampled masses of toluene, n-hexane, trichloroethylene, and isopropyl alcohol, at occupationally relevant air concentrations, to be 12.17 ± 0.06, 8.2 ± 0.1, 3.97 ± 0.06, and 8.0 ± 0.1 mg, respectively. Moreover, the analyte sampling efficiencies were found to be 2.2 ± 0.1, 1.7 ± 0.1, 1.2 ± 0.1, and 0.51 ± 0.05 (unitless) when comparing empirically (i.e., laboratory observed) sample mass values to theoretically predicted values. The sampling efficiencies and collected sample masses reported herein demonstrate the promising design of PTD-compatible diffusive samplers. When used in conjunction with the PTD method, the prototype samplers present strong evidence for improving analytical sensitivity in exposure assessments of VOCs in the workplace.
More Related Videos
05:22Rapid Collection of Floral Fragrance Volatiles using a Headspace Volatile Collection Technique for GC-MS Thermal Desorption Sampling
Published on: December 10, 2019
09:19Capturing Actively Produced Microbial Volatile Organic Compounds from Human-Associated Samples with Vacuum-Assisted Sorbent Extraction
Published on: June 1, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Volatilization
Flame Photometry: Lab
Vaporization
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II
UV–Vis Spectrometers
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...