Coronary Intra-orbital Atherectomy Complications and Procedural Failure: Insight From the Manufacturer and User

Rashid Alhusain1, Dhruvil Patel2, Heba Osman3

  • 1Internal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA.

Cureus
|July 24, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Real-world data reveal device part separation as the most common failure mode for the Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System. Perforation, often leading to cardiac tamponade and death, was the most frequent complication.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Medical Device Safety

Background:

  • The Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System is FDA-approved for treating severely calcified lesions.
  • While clinical trials indicate safety, real-world data on this device are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze real-world adverse events and failure modes of the Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System.
  • To identify common complications and their outcomes using post-market surveillance data.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of adverse event reports from the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.
  • Data from January 2019 to January 2022 were queried for reports concerning the Diamondback 360® Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System.

Main Results:

  • 547 unique reports were analyzed, with device part separation (40.4%) being the most common failure mode, primarily involving the ViperWire tip.
  • Coronary perforation (33.0%) was the most frequent adverse outcome, leading to cardiac tamponade in 23.7% of cases and death in 16.3% of events.
  • The left anterior descending artery was the most commonly affected vessel.

Conclusions:

  • Real-world data indicate that device part separation and perforation are significant concerns with orbital atherectomy.
  • Understanding these failure modes and complications is crucial for physicians to anticipate and manage adverse events effectively.
  • This analysis provides valuable insights for improving patient safety and procedural outcomes.
Abstract