Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 22, 2025

10:38
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
13.7K
Attentional selection is a sufficient cause for visual working memory interference
Zachary Hamblin-Frohman1,2, Stefanie I Becker1,3
1School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Journal of Vision
|July 24, 2023
Summary
Attentional selection, not just visual search, interferes with visual working memory (VWM). Selecting an item, even without a search, impairs VWM, highlighting selection as the key cause of memory interference.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Visual Perception
Background:
- Visual attention and visual working memory (VWM) are crucial for navigating the environment.
- These cognitive systems compete for limited resources, often causing interference when operating together.
- Previous research suggests attentional selection during visual search tasks contributes to VWM deficits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To differentiate the roles of visual search and attentional selection in VWM interference.
- To determine whether the act of searching or the act of selecting an item is the primary cause of memory impairment.
- To investigate the impact of varying search complexity and selection requirements on VWM.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments were conducted to examine the effects of visual search and attentional selection on VWM.
- Experiment 1 compared memory interference during target-present versus target-absent visual searches.
- Experiment 2 manipulated the number of potential targets and the necessity of selection, dissociating search from selection.
Main Results:
- Target-present visual search, requiring attentional selection, significantly interfered with VWM.
- Target-absent search, which did not involve selection, did not cause memory interference.
- A condition requiring selection without extensive search produced interference comparable to standard target-present search.
Conclusions:
- Attentional selection, rather than the search process itself, is a sufficient cause for interference with visual working memory.
- These findings clarify the specific cognitive mechanism underlying VWM load disruptions during visual tasks.
- Understanding this selection-interference link has implications for designing tasks and environments that minimize cognitive load.

