Lobectomy versus gross total resection for glioblastoma multiforme: A systematic review and individual-participant
Yilong Zheng1, Seyed Ehsan Saffari2, David Chyi Yeu Low3
1Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract:
Overall survival (OS)for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has a known association with the extent of tumor resection with gross total resection (GTR) typically considered as the upper limit. In certain regions such as the anterior temporal lobe, more extensive resection by means of a lobectomy may be feasible. In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the outcomes of lobectomy and GTR for GBM. PubMed and Embase were queriedfor studies that compared the outcomes after lobectomy or GTR for GBM. The primary outcomes were OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and Karnofksy Performance Status (KPS) score at the latest follow-up. The secondary outcomes were seizure control at the latest follow-up and complication rates. Meta-analysis for OS and PFS was performed using individual-participant data reconstructed from published Kaplan-Meier curves. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed for KPS. The secondary outcomes were pooled using descriptive statistics. Of the 795 records screened, 6 were included in our study. Meta-analysis revealed that anterior temporal, frontal, or occipital lobectomy was associated with significantly better OS (p < 0.001) and PFS (p < 0.001) than GTR, but not KPS (MD = 6.37; 95% CI=(-13.80, 26.54); p = 0.536). Anterior temporal lobectomy was associated with significantly better seizure control rates than GTR for temporal GBM (OR = 27; 95% CI=(1.4, 515.9); p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between anterior temporal, frontal, or occipital lobectomy and GTR. In conclusion, lobectomy was associated with significantly better OS, PFS, and seizure control than GTR for GBM.
