Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 22, 2025

State of the Art Cranial Ultrasound Imaging in Neonates
Published on: February 2, 2015
Selection of Standards for Sonographic Fetal Head Circumference by Use of z-Scores
C Andrew Combs1,2, Amber Del Rosario2, Olaide Ashimi Balogun3
1Pediatrix Center for Research, Education, Quality and Safety, Pediatrix Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida.
Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate which of five established norms should be used for sonographic assessment of fetal head circumference (HC).
Study Design:
Cross-sectional study using pooled data from four maternal-fetal medicine practices. Inclusion criteria were singleton fetus, gestational age 220/7 to 396/7 weeks, biometry measured, and fetal cardiac activity present. Five norms of HC were studied: Jeanty et al, Hadlock et al, the INTERGROWTH-21st Project (IG-21st), the World Health Organization Fetal Growth Curves (WHO), and the National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies unified standard (NICHD-U). The fit of our HC measurements to each norm was assessed by these criteria: mean z-score close to 0, standard deviation (SD) of z close to 1, low Kolmogorov-Smirnov D-statistic, high Youden J-statistic, close to 10% of exams >90th percentile, close to 10% of exams <10th percentile, and close to 2.28% of exams >2 SD below the mean.
Results:
In 23,565 ultrasound exams, our HC measurements had the best fit to the WHO standard (mean z-score 0.10, SD of z = 1.01, D-statistic <0.01, J-statistic 0.83-0.94). The SD of the Jeanty reference was much larger than all the other norms and our measurements, resulting in underdiagnosis of abnormal HC. The means of the IG-21st and NICHD-U standards were smaller than the other norms and our measurements, resulting in underdiagnosis of small HC. The means of the Hadlock reference were larger than all the other norms and our measurements, resulting in overdiagnosis of small HC. Restricting the analysis to a low-risk subgroup of 4,423 exams without risk factors for large- or small-for-gestational age produced similar results.
Conclusion:
The WHO standard is likely best for diagnosis of abnormal HC. The Jeanty (Chervenak) reference suggested by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine had poor sensitivity for microcephaly screening.
Key Points:
· There are >30 norms for fetal HC.. · It is unknown which norm should be used.. · The WHO standard fits our data best.. · The Chervenak reference is not sensitive for microcephaly..
Related Concept Videos
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
z Scores and Unusual Values
This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Critical Values

