Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 22, 2025

Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
The optimal definition and prediction nomogram for left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction
Sicheng Zhang1,2,3,4, Zheng Zhu5, Manqing Luo1,2,3,4
1Department of Cardiology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Insights
Left ventricular remodelling after myocardial infarction predicts poor outcomes. Defining remodelling by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is crucial for predicting mortality, and a new nomogram aids in identifying at-risk patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Research
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Left ventricular (LV) remodelling post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is linked to heart failure and mortality.
- Lack of consensus on LV remodelling definitions hinders prognostic assessment.
- Previous studies have not compared the prognostic value of different LV remodelling definitions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the optimal definition of LV remodelling after AMI.
- To develop a predictive nomogram for identifying patients at risk of LV remodelling.
- To create an online calculator for assessing LV remodelling risk.
Main Methods:
- Prospective observational study of 829 AMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
- Echocardiography at admission and 6 months to assess LV remodelling (defined by LVEDV, LVESV, or LVEF).
- Lasso and multivariable logistic regression for nomogram development; AUC, calibration, and decision curve analyses for validation.
Main Results:
- Incidences of LV remodelling were 24.85% (LVEDV), 28.71% (LVESV), and 14.60% (LVEF).
- All definitions independently predicted composite endpoints, but only LVEF-defined remodelling predicted all-cause mortality (HR 2.78).
- A 7-variable nomogram (including BP, HR, AMI type, stent length, NT-proBNP, troponin I, glucose) showed good predictive performance (AUC 0.766).
Conclusions:
- LV remodelling, by various definitions, predicts long-term adverse outcomes in post-PCI AMI patients.
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% is the most suitable definition for predicting all-cause mortality.
- The developed nomogram offers an accurate and effective tool for predicting post-infarct LV remodelling.
Aims:
Left ventricular (LV) remodelling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with heart failure and increased mortality. There was no consensus on the definition of LV remodelling, and the prognostic value of LV remodelling with different definitions has not been compared. We aimed to find the optimal definition and develop a prediction nomogram as well as online calculator that can identify patients at risk of LV remodelling.
Methods And Results:
This prospective, observational study included 829 AMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from January 2015 to January 2020. Echocardiography was performed within the 48 h of admission and at 6 months after infarction to evaluate LV remodelling, defined as a 20% increase in LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), a 15% increase in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), or LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% at 6 months. The impact of LV remodelling on long-term outcomes was analysed. Lasso regression was performed to screen potential predictors, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to establish the prediction nomogram. The area under the curve, calibration curve and decision curve analyses were used to determine the discrimination, calibration and clinical usefulness of the remodelling nomogram. The incidences of LV remodelling defined by LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF were 24.85% (n = 206), 28.71% (n = 238) and 14.60% (n = 121), respectively. Multivariable Cox regression models demonstrated that different definitions of LV remodelling were independently associated with the composite endpoint. However, only remodelling defined by LVEF was significantly connected with long-term mortality (hazard ratio = 2.78, 95% confidence interval 1.41-5.48, P = 0.003). Seven variables were selected to construct the remodelling nomogram, including diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, AMI type, stent length, N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, troponin I, and glucose. The prediction model had an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.766. The calibration curve and decision curve analysis indicated consistency and better net benefit in the prediction model.
Conclusions:
LV remodelling defined by LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF were independent predictors for long-term mortality or heart failure hospitalization in AMI patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. However, only remodelling defined by LVEF was suitable for predicting all-cause death. In addition, the nomogram can provide an accurate and effective tool for the prediction of postinfarct remodelling.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

