Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2025
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
An Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of Ceramic Orthodontic Bracket Slot Dimensions Utilizing Micro-Computed
Antonio Garrett1, Maryam A Alghilan2,3,4, Simon Ash5
1Faculty of Dentistry, BPP University, 32-34 Colmore Circus Queensway, Birmingham B4 6BN, UK.
Abstract:
This study's aim is to determine the accuracy and precision of the bracket slot height in MBT 0.022″ ceramic brackets. Five brackets from 11 different systems (n = 55) were scanned using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). The slot height was measured at the face (external) and base (internal) of the slot. Data were analyzed using a One-Sample t-Test, and a Paired t-Test. The lowest external height was seen in OrthoCare Purity® at 0.02264″ (2.9%), and the greatest in TOC Ghost Advanced® at 0.02736″ (24.4%). The lowest internal height was seen in Forestadent Glam® at 0.02020″ (-8.2%), and the greatest in TOC Ghost Advanced® at 0.2547″ (15.8%). OrthoCare Purity® measurements corresponded most closely with the expected measurements. TP InVu® was found to be the most precise bracket for external height (range = 0.00043″) and American Orthodontics 20/40® for internal height (range = 0.00028″). In assessing slot geometry, all brackets demonstrated a higher mean external slot height compared to the internal measurements at the base of the bracket. Orthodontic bracket slots are larger than expected and slot parallelism was not observed in any bracket brand tested. Similarly, slot dimensions are imprecise where two 'identical' brackets have different slot sizes. The clinician should, therefore, assume that play is most likely higher than expected.
