Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2025
Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
Published on: June 16, 2022
Electrode array positioning after cochlear reimplantation from single manufacturer
Miriam R Smetak1, Shanik J Fernando1, Matthew R O'Malley1
1Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Objective:
To investigate whether revision surgery with the same device results in a change in three key indicators of electrode positioning: scalar location, mean modiolar distance (), and angular insertion depth (AID).
Methods:
Retrospective analysis of a cochlear implant database at a university-based tertiary medical center. Intra-operative CT scans were obtained after initial and revision implantation. Electrode array (EA) position was calculated using auto-segmentation techniques. Initial and revision scalar location, , and AID were compared.
Results:
Mean change in for all ears was -0.07 mm (SD 0.24 mm; P = 0.16). The mean change in AID for all ears was -5° (SD 67°; P = 0.72). Three initial implantations with pre-curved EAs resulted in a translocation from Scala Tympani (ST) to Scala Vestibuli (SV). Two remained translocated after revision, while one was corrected when revised with a straight EA. An additional five translocations occurred after revision.
Conclusions:
In this study examining revision cochlear implantation from a single manufacturer, we demonstrated no significant change in key indicators of EA positioning, even when revising with a different style of electrode. However, the revision EA is not necessarily confined by the initial trajectory and there may be an increased risk of translocation.
