Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2025
A New Hybrid Quantitative Evaluation Model for Axillary Junctional Hemorrhage in Swine
Published on: December 6, 2024
Modified Needleman-Wunsch algorithm for trauma management performance evaluation
Blanca Larraga-García1, Fernando Monforte-Escobar2, Rubén Quintero Mínguez3
1Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avenida Complutense, 30, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Background:
Trauma injuries are one of the leading causes of death in the world, representing approximately 8 % of all deaths. Therefore, trauma management training is of great importance and new training courses have arisen during the last decades. However, actual training courses do not typically analyze compliance with the protocols and guidelines available in the literature. Considering general trauma management guidelines such as the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) manual and the expertise of trauma specialists, a trauma management automated evaluation system has been designed in this paper.
Methods:
A modification to the Needleman-Wunsch (NW) algorithm is developed, including all relevant aspects of trauma management to automatically evaluate how a trauma intervention has been implemented according to trauma protocols. This allows to consider more information with respect to the order of the actions taken and the type of actions performed than current evaluation methods, such as checklists or videos recorded in simulation. A web-based trauma simulator is used so that it can be used at any setting with internet connection. Final-year medical students and first- and second-year residents performed an experimental test, where a trauma score is obtained with the modified NW algorithm. This automatic score relates to how similar the actions are to trauma protocols.
Results:
The results show the best combination of the scores used for the modified NW variables. This combination has an error, for the different case scenarios created, below 0.07 which verifies the values obtained. Additionally, trauma experts verified the results obtained showing a median difference of 0 between the protocol adherence evaluation using the algorithm and the one provided by the trauma experts.
Conclusions:
The best set of score values to apply to the modified NW algorithm show that the modified NW algorithm provides a successful objective measurement with respect to the protocol compliance.
