Brain Tumor Segmentation From Multi-Modal MR Images via Ensembling UNets

Glioma is a type of severe brain tumor, and its accurate segmentation is useful in surgery planning and progression evaluation. Based on different biological properties, the glioma can be divided into three partially-overlapping regions of interest, including whole tumor (WT), tumor core (TC), and enhancing tumor (ET). Recently, UNet has identified its effectiveness in automatically segmenting brain tumor from multi-modal magnetic resonance (MR) images. In this work, instead of network architecture, we focus on making use of prior knowledge (brain parcellation), training and testing strategy (joint 3D+2D), ensemble and post-processing to improve the brain tumor segmentation performance. We explore the accuracy of three UNets with different inputs, and then ensemble the corresponding three outputs, followed by post-processing to achieve the final segmentation. Similar to most existing works, the first UNet uses 3D patches of multi-modal MR images as the input. The second UNet uses brain parcellation as an additional input. And the third UNet is inputted by 2D slices of multi-modal MR images, brain parcellation, and probability maps of WT, TC, and ET obtained from the second UNet. Then, we sequentially unify the WT segmentation from the third UNet and the fused TC and ET segmentation from the first and the second UNets as the complete tumor segmentation. Finally, we adopt a post-processing strategy by labeling small ET as non-enhancing tumor to correct some false-positive ET segmentation. On one publicly-available challenge validation dataset (BraTS2018), the proposed segmentation pipeline yielded average Dice scores of 91.03/86.44/80.58% and average 95% Hausdorff distances of 3.76/6.73/2.51 mm for WT/TC/ET, exhibiting superior segmentation performance over other state-of-the-art methods. We then evaluated the proposed method on the BraTS2020 training data through five-fold cross validation, with similar performance having also been observed. The proposed method was finally evaluated on 10 in-house data, the effectiveness of which has been established qualitatively by professional radiologists.