Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2025

Three-Dimensional Phase Resolved Functional Lung Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: June 21, 2024
Deep learning-based left ventricular segmentation demonstrates improved performance on respiratory motion-resolved
Yitong Yang1, Zahraw Shah1, Athira J Jacob2
1Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and the Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Deep learning (DL) segmentation of left ventricular (LV) volumes in cardiac MRI (CMR) performed better using motion-resolved (Mres) reconstructions compared to motion-corrected (Mcorr) ones. This indicates Mres images improve DL accuracy for LV volume analysis in whole-heart CMR.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Medical Image Analysis
Background:
- Deep learning (DL) based segmentation is increasingly used for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) analysis, particularly for left ventricular (LV) volume determination.
- Whole-heart, free-breathing, self-navigated CMR offers high-resolution imaging for cardiac anatomy assessment.
- Combining advanced CMR acquisition with DL segmentation can enhance clinical workflow efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of a DL automatic LV segmentation network, trained on CT images, across two whole-heart CMR reconstruction methods: motion-corrected (Mcorr) and motion-resolved (Mres).
- To evaluate if DL segmentation generalizes better to Mres images, hypothesized to have superior image quality over Mcorr images.
- To assess the accuracy of DL-based LV volume quantification against manual expert tracings.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 15 patients undergoing 1.5T CMR using a 3D radial phyllotaxis bSSFP sequence.
- Comparison of DL-based automatic LV segmentation with manual expert tracings using Absolute Volume Difference (AVD) and 3D Dice Similarity Coefficient.
- Assessment of LV myocardium-blood pool interface sharpness and statistical analysis using paired Student's t-test.
Main Results:
- Lower Absolute Volume Difference (AVD) for Mres (7.73 ± 6.54 ml) compared to Mcorr (20.0 ± 22.4 ml) reconstructions (p=0.03).
- Higher 3D Dice Similarity Coefficient for Mres (0.90 ± 0.02) versus Mcorr (0.87 ± 0.03) images (p=0.02).
- Significantly greater sharpness observed in Mres images (0.15 ± 0.05) than Mcorr images (0.12 ± 0.04) (p=0.014).
Conclusions:
- The DL-based 3D automatic LV segmentation network generalized better to Mres images than Mcorr images for LV volume quantification.
- The findings support the hypothesis that Mres reconstructions yield more accurate DL-based LV segmentation.
- This study highlights the potential of Mres reconstruction to improve the reliability of automated LV volume analysis in whole-heart CMR.
More Related Videos
11:13Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
09:57Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Guided Valve Sizing for Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement
Published on: January 20, 2022