Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Psychoanalysis as a science: a response to the new challenges.

R S Wallerstein

    The Psychoanalytic Quarterly
    |July 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    Psychoanalysis faces ongoing scientific status debates. This paper defends its scientific credibility against philosophical challenges, including hermeneutics and Grünbaum's critiques.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Psychoanalytic research and the IPA: history, present status and future potential.

    The International journal of psycho-analysis·1999
    Same author

    The new American psychoanalysis: a commentary.

    Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·1999
    Same author

    The IPA and the American Psychoanalytic Association: a perspective on the regional association agreement.

    The International journal of psycho-analysis·1998
    Same author

    Erikson's concept of ego identity reconsidered.

    Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·1998
    Same author

    Research in psychodynamic psychotherapy.

    The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York·1996
    Same author

    The identity of psychoanalysis: the question of lay analysis.

    Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic·1996

    Area of Science:

    • Psychoanalysis
    • Philosophy of Science

    Background:

    • The scientific status of psychoanalysis has been a long-standing debate.
    • Attacks have historically come from logical positivists and Karl Popper.
    • Recent decades have seen intensified concerns due to metapsychology debates.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To briefly address historical and contemporary philosophical critiques of psychoanalysis.
    • To develop a detailed response to current philosophy of science challenges.
    • To defend the scientific credibility of psychoanalysis.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of logical positivist and Popperian arguments.
    • Analysis of information-processing systems theory critiques.
    • In-depth response to hermeneutic (Ricoeur, Habermas, Gadamer) arguments.
    • Critique of Adolf Grünbaum's philosophical assault on psychoanalysis.

    Main Results:

    • Provides a concise refutation of earlier scientific critiques.
    • Offers a comprehensive defense against contemporary philosophical challenges.
    • Establishes a framework for understanding psychoanalysis as a science.

    Conclusions:

    • Psychoanalysis maintains its scientific status despite philosophical challenges.
    • The paper strengthens the epistemological foundation of psychoanalysis.
    • Addresses the core concerns regarding psychoanalysis's scientific credibility.

    Related Experiment Videos