Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

12.9K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
12.9K
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

12.5K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
12.5K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

3.1K
3.1K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

13.0K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
13.0K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.2K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.2K
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules02:35

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules

51.9K
Noncovalent attractions are associations within and between molecules that influence the shape and structural stability of complexes. These interactions differ from covalent bonding in that they do not involve sharing of electrons.
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
51.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generating 3D models of complex carbohydrates with GLYCAM-Web.

Nature methods·2026
Same author

Crystal structure of <i>Vibrio cholerae</i> polysaccharide lyase RbmB bound to <i>Vibrio</i> polysaccharide (VPS) fragments provides insights into substrate recognition and cleavage.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

GLYCAM Bacterial Carbohydrate Builder: a web-tool for modelling 3D structures of bacterial glycans.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Exploring Diffusion and Aggregation Behaviors in Carbohydrate Solutions.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same author

Atom-level machine learning of protein-glycan interactions and cross-chiral recognition in glycobiology.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Computational Pipeline for Accelerating the Design of Glycomimetics.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same journal

Improving PCM in Protic Media: Markov State Models for TD-DFT Calculations.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Efficient Coupled-Cluster Python Frameworks for Next-Generation GPUs: A Comparative Study of CuPy and PyTorch on the Hopper and Grace Hopper Architecture.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Extending the MARTINI 3 Coarse-Grained Force Field to Polypeptoids.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Statistical Mechanics of Density- and Temperature-Dependent Potentials: Application to Condensed Phases within GenDPDE.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

BFEE-Docking: A User-Friendly and Customizable End-to-End Tool from High-Throughput Virtual Screening to Binding Free-Energy Calculations.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

On-the-Fly Trajectory Simulation of Two-Pulse, Three-Pulse, and Higher-Order Pump-Probe Signals.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.7K

Protein-Ligand CH-π Interactions: Structural Informatics, Energy Function Development, and Docking Implementation.

Yao Xiao1, Robert J Woods1

  • 1Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|July 26, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new energy function to model CH-π interactions, improving molecular docking accuracy for protein-ligand complexes, especially those involving carbohydrates.

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

102
Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

347

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.7K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

102
Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

347

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Structural biology
  • Drug discovery

Background:

  • CH-π interactions are crucial in protein-ligand binding but lack accurate models in standard computational tools.
  • Existing molecular mechanics force fields and docking scoring functions do not adequately quantify CH-π contributions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an empirical energy function for CH-π interactions using quantum mechanical data.
  • To integrate this new term into the AutoDock Vina (AD VINA) scoring function.
  • To evaluate the impact of the CH-π term on predicting protein-ligand complex structures and enhancing docking performance.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an empirical energy function based on quantum mechanical data for methane-benzene interactions.
  • Incorporated the CH-π term into the AutoDock Vina scoring function.
  • Utilized a conformational grid search algorithm for evaluating ligand orientation.
  • Tested performance against experimental protein-ligand complex structures and benchmark datasets.

Main Results:

  • The CH-π term improved the prediction of preferred ligand orientations in protein-binding sites.
  • Enhanced the detection of carbohydrate-binding sites exhibiting CH-π interactions.
  • Demonstrated improved docking performance on the CASF-2016 benchmark and a specific carbohydrate dataset.

Conclusions:

  • The developed CH-π energy term is a valuable addition to molecular docking scoring functions.
  • This enhancement improves the accuracy of modeling protein-ligand interactions, particularly for carbohydrate ligands.
  • The improved model aids in understanding and predicting binding modes involving CH-π interactions.