Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
"The algorithm will screw you": Blame, social actors and the 2020 A Level results algorithm on Twitter
Dan Heaton1, Elena Nichele1,2, Jeremie Clos1
1School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom.
The 2020 A Level algorithm scandal saw blame attributed to the algorithm, UK government, and Ofqual. Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis revealed nuanced social actor representation, with students assigned limited blame.
Area of Science:
- Computational Linguistics
- Social Sciences
- Discourse Analysis
Background:
- In August 2020, the UK replaced A Level exams with an algorithm, later switching to teacher grades after public outcry.
- Previous analysis of Twitter discourse used NLP-based opinion mining but faced accuracy and interpretation limitations.
- The 2020 A Level grading scandal generated significant public discourse on social media regarding accountability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze blame attribution in Twitter discourse concerning the 2020 A Level algorithm scandal.
- To complement existing NLP research by applying Corpus Linguistics (CL) and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA).
- To examine social actor representation and agency in the discourse surrounding the algorithm.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 18,239 tweets related to the 2020 A Level algorithm.
- Application of Corpus Linguistics (CL) and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) methodologies.
- Examination of transitivity and social actor representation to identify blame attribution.
Main Results:
- The algorithm, UK government, and Ofqual were implicated as social actors responsible for the A Level grading issues.
- Blame was attributed through active agency, metaphorical possession, and passive constructions.
- Students were found to have limited blame assigned to them within the analyzed discourse.
Conclusions:
- CL and CDA offer valuable complementary approaches to NLP tools for analyzing complex social discourse like the A Level scandal.
- The varied linguistic constructions used in the discourse served to obscure clear blame attribution.
- Further research can explore iterative applications of CL and CDA for deeper insights into public discourse.
More Related Videos
08:53Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
11:13The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Fundamental Attribution Error
Reliability and Validity
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Bullying
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies