Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2025

Nasal Brushing Sampling and Processing Using Digital High Speed Ciliary Videomicroscopy – Adaptation for the COVID-19 Pandemic
Published on: November 7, 2020
Patients' rights in physicians' practice during Covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in Romania
Maria Cristina Plaiasu1, Dragos Ovidiu Alexandru2, Codrut Andrei Nanu3
1Doctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 2 Petru Rares St, Craiova, 200349, Romania. cristina.plaiasu@umfcv.ro.
Insights
Physician adherence to patient rights was low during the COVID-19 pandemic, despite legal requirements. Educational and administrative support is recommended to improve legal compliance among healthcare professionals.
Area of Science:
- Medical Law
- Public Health
- Healthcare Management
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted healthcare delivery, challenging established medical practices and norms.
- Legal compliance remained crucial during the pandemic, ensuring patients' rights to equal treatment, specialized care, second opinions, confidentiality, and informed consent.
- This study investigates physician practices concerning patient rights during the pandemic, analyzing factors like age, experience, and specialty, alongside malpractice concerns and legal adherence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess physician compliance with patient rights regulations during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- To explore the influence of physician demographics (age, experience, specialty) on their adherence to patient rights.
- To examine the relationship between fear of malpractice, legal compliance, and physicians working outside their expertise.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study was conducted with attending physicians and general practitioners in Southwestern Romania.
- Data was collected from July 2021 to May 2022 using a convenience sample.
- The study assessed physicians' acknowledgment of patient rights and explored their practices regarding treatment prioritization and scope of practice.
Main Results:
- Overall adherence to patient rights was moderate, with general practitioners showing slightly higher compliance (59.9%) than attending physicians (55.7%).
- Physicians in Emergency and Anesthesia/Intensive Care specialties exhibited the lowest compliance rates.
- A significant portion of attending physicians (46.2%) favored younger patients in treatment prioritization, and over half worked outside their expertise due to staff shortages. Fear of malpractice was prevalent but not directly linked to legal compliance or scope of practice deviations.
Conclusions:
- Physician adherence to patient rights was suboptimal during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Targeted educational and administrative support could enhance physicians' legal compliance.
- Further research is necessary to ascertain whether these practices and compliance levels persist post-pandemic.
Background:
Although the Covid-19 epidemic challenged existing medical care norms and practices, it was no excuse for unlawful conduct. On the contrary, legal compliance proved essential in fighting the pandemic. Within the European legal framework for the pandemic, patients were still entitled to be treated equally, by a specialized physician, with the possibility of seeking a second medical opinion, in a confidential setting, following prior and informed consent. This study examines physicians' practices regarding patients' rights during the Covid-19 pandemic and the effects of age, experience, and specialty on physicians' behavior and preferences. Additionally, it explores the nexus of malpractice complaints, malpractice fear, and legal compliance.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was conducted on a convenience sample of attending physicians and general practitioners to assess compliance with patients' rights regulations. Respondents were physicians practicing in private and public settings in Southwestern Romania from July 2021 to May 2022.
Results:
396 attending physicians and 109 general practitioners participated in the research. Attending physicians acknowledged patients' rights in 55.7% of statements, while general practitioners showed a slightly higher level of compliance at 59.9%. Emergency and Anesthesia and Intensive Care physicians showed the lowest compliance. There were no significant behavioral differences based on physicians' age, years in practice, work sector, or location. However, when faced with the question of prioritizing treatment for patients with similar medical conditions, 46.2% of attending physicians reported favoring the younger patients. This preference was common among physicians under 39. Additionally, over half of the attending physicians reported working outside their area of expertise due to staff shortages. Malpractice fear was high among physicians, although unrelated to patients' claims, legal compliance, or working outside the scope of practice. It resulted in pressure and behavioral changes.
Conclusion:
Adherence to patients' rights was low during the Covid-19 pandemic. Physicians could benefit from educational and administrative support to ensure better legal compliance. Further research is needed to determine if this behavior persists beyond the pandemic context.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and...
Standards of Care II
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Legal Guidelines for Documentation

