Investigation of Assessment Tools in the Area of Pediatric Feeding Evaluation: A Mixed-Methods Study

Paula A Rabaey1, Kate Barlow2, Hibak Jama3

  • 1Paula A. Rabaey, PhD, MPH, OTR/L, is Associate Professor, Occupational Therapy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; rabae010@umn.edu.

Insights

Pediatric feeding disorder (PFD) assessment by occupational therapists and speech-language pathologists often relies on nonstandardized tools. This highlights a critical need for validated, reliable assessments across all PFD domains.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric feeding and swallowing disorders
  • Clinical assessment and diagnostics
  • Occupational therapy and speech-language pathology practices

Background:

  • The International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition, Clinical Modification, introduced a new diagnostic code for Pediatric Feeding Disorder (PFD).
  • This necessitates the use of valid and reliable assessment tools by occupational therapists (OTs) and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to capture PFD's complexity.
  • Current practices may not fully align with these requirements, impacting accurate diagnosis and treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify assessment tools currently utilized by clinicians for the four domains of PFD: medical, nutrition, feeding skills, and psychosocial factors.
  • To gather clinicians' perspectives and perceptions regarding the assessment tools they employ.
  • To inform the development and adoption of standardized assessment procedures.

Main Methods:

  • A mixed-methods approach combining online surveys and virtual focus groups.
  • Surveys were distributed to OTs and SLPs treating PFD.
  • Focus groups provided qualitative insights to supplement survey data.

Main Results:

  • The survey indicated that 65% of clinicians (N=445) used nonstandardized assessment tools across the four PFD domains.
  • Focus groups (n=26) revealed themes including the inadequacy of single assessment tools, reliance on self-created assessments, the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration, and challenges with current PFD assessment.
  • A significant gap exists between the need for standardized tools and current clinical practice.

Conclusions:

  • There is a clear need for OTs and SLPs working with children with PFD to utilize assessment tools with strong psychometric properties.
  • Entry-level education should emphasize reliable and valid assessment tools that comprehensively evaluate all domains of PFD.
  • Standardized assessment procedures and tools are crucial for accurate evaluation and effective treatment of pediatric feeding disorders.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos