Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2025

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Splint Quality Assessment and Improvement Among Emergency Department Staff
Jason Cucchiara1, Julie Thompson, Michael Zychowicz
1School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Drs Cucchiara, Thompson, and Zychowicz); Northern Orthopaedics, Mount Airy, North Carolina (Drs Cucchiara and Williamson); and Mount Airy Emergency Physicians, Mount Airy, North Carolina (Dr McHone).
Abstract:
The purpose of this quality improvement project is to assess and improve the quality of splint application in the emergency department (ED), as well as the splint application confidence level of the ED staff. Consistent and high-quality splint application is critical in fracture stabilization and prevention of further injury. Significantly high turnover and a lack of formal training of ED staff has led to poor splint application, and in some cases, patient injuries related to the splints themselves. These injuries include pain, edema, and skin complications (A. P. Carino, 2017). A random, Likert-based analysis was performed on 20 ED-applied splints. Once analysis was complete, training courses were implemented to improve splint application techniques. Using the same Likert-based tool, applications of 20 posttraining splints were analyzed. In addition, ED staff confidence levels were scored before and after the training courses. Overall, statistically significant improvement was achieved in splint application quality and staff confidence. Correct splint applications increased from 50% to 95% after the educational sessions. Staff confidence in splint application also increased, from 35% to 77.1%. Quality splint application affects all patients. The higher risk population is more likely to suffer the consequences of poor splint application. This project had a positive impact on the region's marginalized patient population. These patients have limited resources, including lack of transportation, financial limitations, and typically are at higher risk for complications due to comorbidities.
Related Concept Videos
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:

