Continuous sensing and quantification of body motion in infants: A systematic review
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026
Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
Published on: June 1, 2015
Zheng Peng1,2, Deedee Kommers1,3, Rong-Hao Liang4,5
1Department of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Insights
Continuous infant motion quantification using various sensing technologies can improve vital sign monitoring and aid in diagnosing infant complications, addressing gaps in current clinical observation methods.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Neonatal Medicine
- Clinical Monitoring
Background:
- Abnormal infant body motion can indicate neurodevelopmental delay or critical illness.
- Current infant monitoring relies on discrete clinical observations, leaving infants unattended.
- Continuous monitoring of infant body motion is needed to fill this observational gap.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and compare sensing technologies for continuous infant body motion quantification.
- To evaluate the pros and cons of different sensing technologies in clinical applications.
- To highlight the clinical value and future prospects of infant motion monitoring.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) method.
- Introduction and comparison of various sensing technologies for infant motion quantification.
- Discussion of clinical applications, advantages, and disadvantages of each technology.
Main Results:
- Identified and compared multiple sensing technologies suitable for infant motion quantification.
- Evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of each technology for clinical use.
- Highlighted the potential benefits of continuous motion monitoring for infant care.
Conclusions:
- Motion quantification offers significant clinical value in diagnosing infant complications.
- Continuous infant motion monitoring can enhance the performance of vital sign monitoring systems.
- Recommendations are provided for clinical users to implement motion quantification technologies.
Abstract:
Abnormal body motion in infants may be associated with neurodevelopmental delay or critical illness. In contrast to continuous patient monitoring of the basic vitals, the body motion of infants is only determined by discrete periodic clinical observations of caregivers, leaving the infants unattended for observation for a longer time. One step to fill this gap is to introduce and compare different sensing technologies that are suitable for continuous infant body motion quantification. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review for infant body motion quantification based on the PRISMA method (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). In this systematic review, we introduce and compare several sensing technologies with motion quantification in different clinical applications. We discuss the pros and cons of each sensing technology for motion quantification. Additionally, we highlight the clinical value and prospects of infant motion monitoring. Finally, we provide suggestions with specific needs in clinical practice, which can be referred by clinical users for their implementation. Our findings suggest that motion quantification can improve the performance of vital sign monitoring, and can provide clinical value to the diagnosis of complications in infants.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Influenza
01:29Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease