Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2025

06:30
Complete and Partial Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta for Hemorrhagic Shock
Published on: May 19, 2022
6.1K
Rapid Response System for In-Hospital Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case-Control Study
Satoru Fujiwara1, Nobuyuki Ohara1, Hirotoshi Imamura2
1Department of Neurology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy
|July 28, 2023
Summary
Rapid Response Systems (RRS) significantly reduce treatment times for hospitalized patients experiencing large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes. This system enables faster assessment and intervention, improving outcomes for critical stroke cases.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Emergency Medicine
- Hospital Medicine
Background:
- Large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke in hospitalized patients is a critical condition requiring rapid intervention.
- Existing protocols for in-hospital LVO are limited, highlighting a need for improved time-saving strategies.
- Rapid Response Systems (RRS) offer a potential solution for accelerating acute stroke management within hospitals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of a Rapid Response System (RRS) in reducing treatment times for in-hospital large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes.
- To compare the time metrics of stroke management with and without RRS intervention.
- To assess the validity of expanded RRS activation criteria for neurological emergencies.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective evaluation of 26 hospitalized patients with LVO undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) between April 2015 and January 2020.
- Implementation of revised RRS criteria in November 2017, including specific neurological symptoms.
- Comparison of time from detection to stroke team assessment and initial CT between RRS and non-RRS groups.
Main Results:
- The RRS group demonstrated significantly shorter median times for stroke team assessment (10 vs. 65.5 minutes) and initial CT (22 vs. 46.5 minutes).
- RRS was activated in 34 patients under the revised criteria, with 58.8% diagnosed with cerebral infarction and 9 undergoing MT.
- Other RRS-activated cases frequently involved neurological emergencies requiring acute care.
Conclusions:
- Rapid Response Systems (RRS) can significantly shorten response times in managing in-hospital LVO.
- Prompt patient transport to the emergency room by a Medical Emergency Team (MET) facilitates faster stroke team intervention.
- RRS implementation, with expanded criteria, effectively addresses neurological emergencies, including LVO strokes.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
10
Diagnosing acute coronary syndrome or ACS begins with a thorough patient history. Notable symptoms include central, crushing chest pain radiating to the left arm, neck, jaw, or back, along with shortness of breath, sweating (diaphoresis), nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and palpitations.It is crucial to note any history of cardiac illnesses and assess risk factors, including age, gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and a sedentary lifestyle.During physical examination, vital...
10
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
12
IntroductionThe management of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) aims to minimize myocardial damage, preserve myocardial function, and prevent complications.Initial ManagementInpatient management involves continuous cardiac monitoring, preferably in an ICU, focusing on blood pressure, serum sodium, potassium, and creatinine levels, and urine output. Ongoing pharmacologic management is crucial for stabilizing the patient.Supplemental Oxygen: Administer supplemental oxygen if oxygen saturation is...
12

