Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Principle01:19

Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Principle

700
Inductively coupled plasma (ICP) is the most widely used plasma source in atomic emission spectroscopy (AES), also known as Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES). The ICP source, or torch, consists of three concentric quartz tubes with argon gas flowing through them. A spark from a Tesla coil initiates the ionization of argon, generating a high-temperature plasma.
The ions and electrons produced interact with the fluctuating magnetic field created by a water-cooled...
700
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Interference01:30

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Interference

231
In atomic emission spectroscopy (AES), high-temperature atomizers excite a broad range of elements and molecules that generate complex emissions from sources such as oxides, hydroxides, and flame combustion products in the flame or plasma. Several strategies can be employed to minimize spectral interferences caused by overlapping emission lines or bands. These include increasing instrument resolution, choosing alternative emission lines, optimally placing the detector in low-background regions,...
231
Washing, Drying, and Ignition of Precipitates00:52

Washing, Drying, and Ignition of Precipitates

955
After filtration, the precipitate is washed to remove coprecipitated impurities and any remaining mother liquor. Colloidal precipitates, such as silver chloride, are washed with an electrolyte (such as dilute nitric acid) to prevent the peptization of the precipitate. In the case of slightly soluble precipitates, the wash solution contains a common ion to reduce solubility. Lead sulfate, which is slightly soluble in water, is washed with dilute sulfuric acid. Similarly, wash solutions may be...
955

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chain-Like Semiconductive Fillers for Dielectric Enhancement and Loss Reduction of Polymer Composites.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2024
Same author

Performance of Cu/ZnO Nanosheets on Electrospun Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Nanofibers in CO<sub>2</sub> Catalytic Hydrogenation to Methanol and Dimethyl Ether.

Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Highly Transparent Polycrystalline MgO via Spark Plasma Sintering.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2022
Same author

Metal nanoparticles entrapped in metal matrices.

Nanoscale advances·2022
Same author

Composite Indium Tin Oxide Nanofibers with Embedded Hematite Nanoparticles for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2022
Same author

Electrospun nanofibers with surface oriented lamellar patterns and their potential applications.

Nanoscale·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 21, 2025

Spark Plasma Sintering Apparatus Used for the Formation of Strontium Titanate Bicrystals
11:17

Spark Plasma Sintering Apparatus Used for the Formation of Strontium Titanate Bicrystals

Published on: February 9, 2017

9.9K

Carbon Contamination Prevention during Spark Plasma Sintering.

Michal Sakajio1, Gennady E Shter1, Meirav Mann-Lahav1

  • 1The Wolfson Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 3200003, Israel.

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
|July 28, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study investigates how to prevent carbon contamination in transparent YAG ceramics during spark plasma sintering. The researchers tested tantalum and molybdenum foils as protective barriers between the ceramic and graphite molds. Tantalum formed a reaction layer that blocked carbon diffusion, improving transparency. Molybdenum allowed carbon to enter, causing structural issues. A multilayer of Ta and Mo worked better if Ta was thick enough. Both methods achieved similar optical results. The findings show that Ta is effective in preventing contamination. The study also introduced a new way to bond ceramics to metals using a Ta layer at the interface.

Keywords:
carbon contaminationeutectic oxidesmetal foilsspark plasma sinteringtransparent YAGSpark plasma sinteringTransparent ceramicsCarbon contaminationTantalum barrier

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Treating Surfaces with a Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma using the COST-Jet
06:36

Treating Surfaces with a Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma using the COST-Jet

Published on: November 2, 2020

4.1K
Experimental Methods of Dust Charging and Mobilization on Surfaces with Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation or Plasmas
07:54

Experimental Methods of Dust Charging and Mobilization on Surfaces with Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation or Plasmas

Published on: April 3, 2018

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 21, 2025

Spark Plasma Sintering Apparatus Used for the Formation of Strontium Titanate Bicrystals
11:17

Spark Plasma Sintering Apparatus Used for the Formation of Strontium Titanate Bicrystals

Published on: February 9, 2017

9.9K
Treating Surfaces with a Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma using the COST-Jet
06:36

Treating Surfaces with a Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma using the COST-Jet

Published on: November 2, 2020

4.1K
Experimental Methods of Dust Charging and Mobilization on Surfaces with Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation or Plasmas
07:54

Experimental Methods of Dust Charging and Mobilization on Surfaces with Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation or Plasmas

Published on: April 3, 2018

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Ceramic materials processing
  • Materials science within advanced manufacturing
  • Metal-ceramic interface engineering

Background:

Graphite molds used in spark plasma sintering introduce carbon contamination, which alters the optical and mechanical properties of ceramic materials. This issue is particularly critical for transparent ceramics, where even minor contamination can degrade performance. Prior research has shown that graphite-based tools are a primary source of carbon diffusion during sintering processes. However, the effectiveness of alternative protective barriers remains understudied. Existing methods often fail to prevent contamination while maintaining structural integrity. No prior work had resolved the comparative performance of molybdenum and tantalum foils in this context. This gap motivated the investigation of Ta and Mo as potential barriers. The uncertainty around their protective mechanisms and optical outcomes led to this study. The need to preserve transparency in YAG ceramics drove the exploration of these materials.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of tantalum and molybdenum foils in preventing carbon contamination during spark plasma sintering of YAG ceramics. The specific problem addressed is the degradation of ceramic transparency due to carbon diffusion from graphite molds. The motivation stems from the demand for high-purity transparent ceramics in optical applications. The authors sought to determine whether Ta or Mo could serve as a reliable protective layer. They also aimed to compare the structural and optical outcomes of using these materials. The study focused on identifying the mechanisms behind contamination suppression. By analyzing microstructural and transparency changes, the researchers aimed to propose a practical solution. The goal was to provide a reproducible method for contamination prevention in SPS.

Main Methods:

The researchers used spark plasma sintering to fabricate YAG ceramics with protective barriers made of tantalum and molybdenum foils. They tested both single-layer and multilayer configurations of Ta and Mo. The foils were placed between the graphite mold and the ceramic sample to act as barriers. The sintering process was conducted under controlled temperature and pressure conditions. The resulting ceramics were analyzed for transparency using optical measurements. Microstructural analysis was performed using scanning electron microscopy. The study also examined the formation of reaction layers at the Ta-YAG interface. The effectiveness of each barrier was evaluated based on carbon diffusion and structural uniformity.

Main Results:

Tantalum foils formed a reaction layer composed of YTaO₄ and Al₂O₃ at the interface, which suppressed carbon penetration into the ceramic. This layer increased the transparency of the sintered YAG ceramics. Molybdenum foils, in contrast, allowed carbon diffusion into the ceramic, leading to nonuniform microstructural features. The Ta-Mo multilayer barrier improved outcomes when Ta thickness exceeded 100 μm. This was attributed to the diffusion-blocking mechanism of tantalum. Both approaches achieved similar optical performance in the final ceramics. The study confirmed that Ta-based barriers effectively prevent carbon contamination. The results suggest that Ta is more effective than Mo in this context.

Conclusions:

The study demonstrates that tantalum foils can effectively prevent carbon contamination during spark plasma sintering of YAG ceramics. The formation of a YTaO₄-Al₂O₃ eutectic layer at the Ta-YAG interface suppresses carbon diffusion. This mechanism increases ceramic transparency and structural uniformity. Molybdenum foils, while removable from the ceramic surface, do not form a reactive layer and allow carbon penetration. A multilayer Ta-Mo barrier improves outcomes when Ta thickness exceeds 100 μm. The interior diffusion-blocking property of Ta is the key to its effectiveness. Both Ta-based approaches achieved similar optical performance in the final ceramics. The findings suggest that Ta is a viable protective barrier for contamination prevention in SPS.

Tantalum forms a YTaO₄-Al₂O₃ eutectic reaction layer at the interface, which suppresses carbon penetration into the ceramic.

Molybdenum does not form a reactive layer and fails to block carbon diffusion, leading to nonuniform microstructural features.

A Ta thickness above 100 μm enhances the interior diffusion-blocking mechanism, improving contamination prevention.

Ta prevents carbon diffusion and promotes uniform microstructure, while Mo allows carbon penetration, leading to nonuniform features.

Both Ta-based approaches achieved similar optical performance, with increased transparency due to reduced carbon contamination.

The study proposed using a Ta layer at the joint interface to bond oxide ceramics to metals effectively.