Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2025

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Stemless reverse humeral component neck-shaft angle has an influence on initial fixation.
David E Cunningham1, Gregory W Spangenberg1, G Daniel G Langohr1
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada; The Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Hospital, London, ON, Canada.
Optimizing the neck-shaft angle for stemless reverse shoulder implants is crucial for stability. Higher angles, like 140-150°, significantly reduce bone-implant distraction during daily activities, enhancing fixation.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Biomechanical engineering
- Implant design
Background:
- Stemless anatomic humeral components are a viable alternative to stemmed implants in patients with good bone quality.
- Limited research exists on factors influencing primary fixation of stemless reverse humeral implants.
- This study investigates the impact of neck-shaft angle on stemless reverse humeral implant stability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effect of surgical neck-shaft angle on the primary time-zero fixation of stemless reverse humeral implants.
- To determine the optimal neck-shaft angle for maximizing implant stability.
Main Methods:
- Finite element analysis of eight CT-derived humeral models.
- Simulated implantation of a generic stemless humeral implant at neck-shaft angles of 130°, 135°, 140°, 145°, and 150°.
- Analysis of four simulated daily living loading scenarios to measure bone-implant micromotion.
Main Results:
- The greatest implant-bone distraction occurred at the 130° neck-shaft angle.
- Increasing the neck-shaft angle significantly reduced micromotion (P=.0001).
- Each 5° increase in neck-shaft angle resulted in an average 17% reduction in bone-implant distraction.
Conclusions:
- Neck-shaft angle is a critical, modifiable factor for stemless reverse humeral component stability.
- Varus neck-shaft angles (e.g., 130°) increase bone-implant distraction.
- Humeral head osteotomies at higher neck-shaft angles may improve stemless implant stability.
Related Concept Videos
Bones of the Upper Limb: Humerus
Residual Stresses in Circular Shafts
Deformation in a Circular Shaft

