Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2025

A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
Published on: January 18, 2018
Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Tribulations: Providing Clinical Evidence for Personalized Surgical Pain
Ivo Abraham1, Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski2,3,4, John C Elfar5
1Pharmacy Medicine, and Clinical Translational Sciences, University of Arizona, Roy P. Drachman Hall, Rm. B306H, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Conducting clinical trials for personalized surgical pain management is difficult due to challenges in standardizing procedures and controlling patient variables. This review examines these issues and proposes practical solutions for better surgical trial design.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Research
- Pain Management
- Clinical Trial Design
Background:
- Proving clinical superiority of personalized surgical pain management is hindered by the inherent complexity and variability of surgical procedures.
- Standardizing interventions, controlling for patient-specific factors like comorbidities and anatomy, and avoiding bias are significant challenges in surgical trials.
- Small sample sizes and difficulties in blinding participants and investigators further complicate the assessment of personalized surgical approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and review the multifaceted challenges encountered in conducting clinical trials for personalized surgical pain management.
- To offer practical solutions and strategies for overcoming these obstacles and improving the design and execution of surgical trials.
- To emphasize the need for high-grade evidence to support changes in traditional treatment protocols for pain management.
Main Methods:
- The authors conducted a comprehensive review of existing literature and clinical practices related to surgical trials in pain management.
- Analysis focused on identifying common sources of bias, logistical difficulties, and ethical considerations specific to personalized surgical interventions.
- The review synthesizes these findings to propose actionable recommendations for future research.
Main Results:
- Key challenges include the inability to standardize complex surgical steps, variability in patient populations, and difficulties in effective blinding and randomization.
- Hindsight bias, restrictive eligibility criteria, and ethical concerns related to patient safety can significantly impact trial outcomes.
- The cost and long-term follow-up requirements for complex surgical interventions add further complexity to trial design.
Conclusions:
- Overcoming the inherent challenges in surgical trials requires innovative methodologies and careful consideration of patient-specific factors.
- Implementing practical solutions can lead to more robust evidence for personalized pain management strategies.
- High-quality evidence is crucial for advancing surgical pain management beyond traditional, image-based criteria.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Analgesia and Pain Management
Clinical Trials: Overview
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...

