Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2025

Production of Single Tracks of Ti-6Al-4V by Directed Energy Deposition to Determine the Layer Thickness for Multilayer Deposition
Published on: March 13, 2018
Advanced Optimization of Surface Characteristics and Material Removal Rate for Biocompatible Ti6Al4V Using WEDM
Anbazhagan Nagadeepan1, Govindarajalu Jayaprakash2, Vagheesan Senthilkumar1
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, SRM TRP Engineering College, Trichy 621105, Tamilnadu, India.
Abstract:
Machining titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) used in orthopedic implants via conventional metal cutting processes is challenging due to excessive cutting forces, low surface integrity, and tool wear. To overcome these difficulties and ensure high-quality products, various industries employ wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) for precise machining of intricate shapes in titanium alloy. The objective is to make WEDM machining parameters as efficient as possible for machining the biocompatible alloy Ti6Al4Vusing Box-Behnken design (BBD) and nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA II). A quadratic mathematical model is created to represent the productivity and the quality factor (MRR and surface roughness) in terms of varying input parameters, such as pulse active (Ton) time, pulse inactive (Toff) time, peak amplitude (A) current, and applied servo (V) voltage. The established regression models and related prediction plots provide a reliable approach for predicting how the process variables affect the two responses, namely, MRR and SR. The effects of four process variables on both the responses were examined, and the findings revealed that the pulse duration and voltage have a major influence on the rate at which material is removed (MRR), whereas the pulse duration influences quality (SR). The tradeoff between MRR and SR, when significant process factors are included, emphasizes the need for a reliable multi-objective optimization method. The intelligent metaheuristic optimization method named nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA II) was utilized to provide pareto optimum solutions in order to achieve high material removal rate (MRR) and low surface roughness (SR).

