Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Vaccinations01:51

Vaccinations

44.7K
Overview
44.7K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

128
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
128
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.1K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

353
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
353
Cancer Vaccines01:30

Cancer Vaccines

405
Cancer treatment vaccines are a rapidly evolving field that offers a promising approach to immunotherapy. Unlike traditional vaccines that prevent diseases, cancer treatment vaccines are designed to treat existing cancers by stimulating the immune system to recognize and attack cancer cells.
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
405

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Workplace Harassment and All-Cause Mortality in a Longitudinal Cohort over a 24-Year Period.

Occupational Health·2026
Same author

Probing in Cognitive Interviews can Promote Acquiescence.

Methoden, daten, analysen·2026
Same author

An Ounce of Prevention: Using Conversational Interviewing and Avoiding Agreement Response Scales to Prevent Acquiescence.

Quality & quantity·2026
Same author

Workplace Sexual Harassment and the Risk of Chronic Disease in a Prospective Cohort Study.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Profiles of economic and non-economic chronic stressors at midlife.

Journal of applied developmental psychology·2025
Same author

Social support is not enough to buffer the effects of stressors on substance use at midlife.

Discover psychology·2025
Same journal

Correction: Fukushima et al. Long-Term Immunogenicity of Rabies Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Japanese Adult Travelers: Comparison of Dosing Regimens. <i>Vaccines</i> 2025, <i>13</i>, 1169.

Vaccines·2026
Same journal

Access to Vaccines Among Asylum Seekers, Refugees, and Undocumented Migrants Across the Migratory Cycle in the European Union, European Economic Area, Switzerland and the United Kingdom: A Scoping Review.

Vaccines·2026
Same journal

Advances in Detection Methods for Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Neutralizing Antibodies.

Vaccines·2026
Same journal

Insights from 25 Years of Measles and Measles-Rubella Vaccination Campaigns in the WHO African Region (2001-2025).

Vaccines·2026
Same journal

Post-Marketing Safety Surveillance of Influenza Vaccines in Anhui Province, China, 2016-2025.

Vaccines·2026
Same journal

Characteristics of Hypotonic-Hyporesponsive Episodes (HHEs) Following Childhood Vaccination: A 13-Year Analysis of Spontaneous Reports to the Dutch Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb.

Vaccines·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

8.0K

How Scientists View Vaccine Hesitancy.

Eric W Welch1,2, Timothy P Johnson3, Tipeng Chen1

  • 1Center for Science, Technology and Environmental Policy Studies, School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.

Vaccines
|July 29, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Academic scientists offer diverse views on tackling vaccine hesitancy in the US. Transparency in communicating vaccine risks and research is crucial for improving public trust and addressing concerns.

Keywords:
decision makinghealth crisisriskscience communicationscience controversyscientist opinionsscientist rolesvaccine hesitancy

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Optimizing CFU Determination for Efficient Assessment of TB Vaccine Efficacy and Antigen Presentation Analysis
06:26

Author Spotlight: Optimizing CFU Determination for Efficient Assessment of TB Vaccine Efficacy and Antigen Presentation Analysis

Published on: July 28, 2023

2.3K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

8.0K
Author Spotlight: Optimizing CFU Determination for Efficient Assessment of TB Vaccine Efficacy and Antigen Presentation Analysis
06:26

Author Spotlight: Optimizing CFU Determination for Efficient Assessment of TB Vaccine Efficacy and Antigen Presentation Analysis

Published on: July 28, 2023

2.3K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Scientific Communication
  • Sociology of Science

Background:

  • Vaccine hesitancy poses a significant challenge to public health initiatives in the United States.
  • Understanding the perspectives of academic scientists is crucial for developing effective strategies to combat vaccine hesitancy.
  • Existing literature may not fully capture the nuanced opinions within the scientific community regarding vaccine acceptance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the causes, consequences, and potential solutions for vaccine hesitancy from the viewpoint of academic scientists.
  • To investigate how scientists' insights on vaccine hesitancy align with or differ from current research.
  • To identify scientists' preferred approaches for policy, regulation, and science-society communication concerning vaccines.

Main Methods:

  • A national survey was conducted with a representative sample of academic scientists in biology and public health.
  • Empirical analysis included descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate statistical methods.
  • The survey addressed topics such as vaccine controversy, trust in science, risk perception, and scientists' communication roles.

Main Results:

  • Significant diversity of opinions exists within the scientific community regarding vaccine hesitancy.
  • Scientists identified a need for greater transparency in communicating vaccine risks and research findings to the public.
  • Trust in science and effective science-society communication emerged as key themes.

Conclusions:

  • The scientific community holds varied perspectives on addressing vaccine hesitancy.
  • Enhanced transparency and candid communication about vaccine risks are essential for building public trust.
  • Further research is needed to bridge the gap between scientific understanding and public perception of vaccines.