Striving for consistent bioassessment across diverse landscapes: Using land use matters for classifying reference and...

Consistency in ecological assessments is challenging across large diverse landscapes because natural geological, climatic, and hydrological factors vary greatly. As a result, large landscapes are often subdivided into ecoregions and assessments are based on ecoregion specific indices. In the present study, we developed and compared multimetric indices (MMIs) using benthic diatom data from the 2008-2009 dataset from the United States (US) National Rivers and Streams Assessment. Nationwide and separate ecoregion specific MMIs were developed with reference, moderately disturbed, and highly disturbed sites selected using criteria based on physicochemical condition of the habitat or based on watershed land use (% agriculture and % urban). Metrics were adjusted to account for variation in natural conditions when needed. We found only land use criteria selected reference sites with consistently low median % watershed disturbance (%WD) and large differences in %WD between reference and highly disturbed sites. <38 % of sites were identified as reference or highly disturbed by both physicochemical and land use criteria. All MMIs displayed substantial discrimination ability between reference and highly disturbed sites. At the national scale, MMIs based on land use outperformed MMIs based on physicochemical conditions for all performance attributes tested. When national scale MMIs were applied to ecoregions, MMIs based on land use were again better than MMIs based on physicochemical conditions for most performance attributes and even had better or comparable performance to the land use MMIs developed separately for each ecoregion. Our findings show that developing MMIs using land use criteria and adjusting metrics for natural variation could improve assessment consistency without losing MMI performance across large, diverse landscapes as in the US National Rivers and Streams Assessment.