Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale: reliability and validity.

J Davidson, C D Turnbull, R Strickland

    Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
    |May 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Multi-site feasibility of a web-based and telephone navigation intervention to connect lung cancer caregivers in community oncology settings with resources: Protocol for the WF-2301CD Caregiver Oncology Needs Evaluation Tool (CONNECT) trial.

    Contemporary clinical trials·2026
    Same author

    Evidence for the Collective Nature of Radial Flow in Pb+Pb Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2026
    Same author

    Evidence for the Dimuon Decay of the Higgs Boson in pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Evidence for Longitudinally Polarized W Bosons in the Electroweak Production of Same-Sign W Boson Pairs in Association with Two Jets in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Global Burden of Animal Diseases informatics strategy, data quality and model interoperability.

    Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)·2024
    Same author

    Evaluating the efficacy and safety of neonatal chyme reinfusion therapy: A feasibility study using a novel medical device.

    Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2024
    Same journal

    Cardiometabolic Treatment Gap in Routine Psychiatric Care: A Cross-Sectional Study of 1553 Patients.

    Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2026
    Same journal

    Reevaluating the Role of ADHD Perceptions in Medication Continuation: Methodological and Interpretative Considerations.

    Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2026
    Same journal

    AI-Associated Psychotic Phenomena: Collect Before You Classify.

    Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2026
    Same journal

    Developmental Trauma as a Prognostic Factor for Later Psychotic Disorder in an Adolescent Clinical Cohort: A 20-Year Follow Up Study.

    Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2026
    Same journal

    The Prevalence of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea in Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

    Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2026
    Same journal

    Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and the Associated Risk of Hospitalisation in Bipolar Disorder, From a Nationwide Cohort, 2009-2024.

    Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2026
    See all related articles

    The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale effectively measures depression in inpatients, showing good validity and reliability. However, sleep, appetite, and suicidal thoughts showed poor correlation with other scale items.

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Psychometrics

    Background:

    • Depression assessment requires reliable and valid tools.
    • The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) is a widely used instrument.
    • Evaluating the psychometric properties of depression scales is crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment monitoring.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the construct and concurrent validity of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS).
    • To assess the inter-rater reliability of the MADRS among different clinical raters.
    • To identify potential limitations or areas for improvement in the MADRS.

    Main Methods:

    • The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) was administered to 44 depressed inpatients.
    • Internal consistency (construct validity) was assessed.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Concurrent validity was examined against the Hamilton Depression Scale.
  • Inter-rater reliability was tested between a psychiatrist and a nurse.

    • Main Results:

    • The MADRS demonstrated good construct validity (internal homogeneity) and concurrent validity.
    • Inter-rater reliability was high for both individual items and total scale scores.
    • Sleep disturbance, reduced appetite, and suicidal ideation items showed poor correlation with the overall scale.

    Conclusions:

    • The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) is a valid and reliable tool for assessing depression in inpatient settings.
    • Specific symptoms like sleep disturbance, appetite changes, and suicidal thoughts may require further investigation or alternative assessment methods.
    • The findings support the continued use of the MADRS while highlighting areas for potential refinement.