Birth size, school performance and family social position: a study of 650,000 children

Karri Silventoinen1,2, Juha Luukkonen3, Mikko Myrskylä3,4,5,6

  • 1Population Research Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. karri.silventoinen@helsinki.fi.

Pediatric Research
|July 29, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Birth length is a stronger predictor of school performance than birth weight, especially in lower socioeconomic families. This highlights the importance of the intrauterine environment for cognitive development.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Low birth weight is linked to poorer cognitive function.
  • Associations across the full birth weight spectrum and its components require further investigation.
  • Family social position may modify these associations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the relationship between birth weight, birth length, and birth ponderal index with school performance.
  • To investigate how childhood family social position influences these associations.
  • To determine which anthropometric measures are most predictive of later academic achievement.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Finnish national birth and school performance records (1987-1997, N=642,425).
  • Employed population-averaged and within-siblings fixed-effects linear regression models.
  • Analyzed associations across the full distribution of birth measurements.

Main Results:

  • Birth length demonstrated a linear association with school performance, while birth weight showed a curvilinear relationship.
  • Birth length explained more variation in school performance (0.08% in boys, 0.14% in girls) compared to birth weight.
  • The association between birth length and school performance was more pronounced in lower socioeconomic families.

Conclusions:

  • Birth length is a significant linear predictor of school performance in late adolescence.
  • Birth length provides valuable insights into intrauterine environmental influences on cognitive outcomes.
  • Interventions targeting the intrauterine environment may positively impact long-term academic achievement.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Biological Influences on Intelligence01:30

Biological Influences on Intelligence

Intelligence is often thought to be linked to brain size, but the relationship is more complex than that. While brain size does correlate modestly with some abilities, like verbal skills, the connection is weaker for others, such as spatial reasoning. Other factors, like brain structure, also play crucial roles. For instance, despite Einstein's smaller-than-average brain, his parietal cortex, which is involved in spatial reasoning, was 15% wider, suggesting that neural density might matter...
145
Environmental Influences on Intelligence01:29

Environmental Influences on Intelligence

Despite the strong genetic influence on traits like intelligence, environmental factors significantly shape outcomes. For example, while over 90% of height variation is due to genetic differences, environmental factors such as nutrition also have a notable impact. Similarly, for intelligence, changes in a child's surroundings can significantly alter their IQ. Research shows that enriched environments boost children's academic success and help them develop key cognitive skills. Children...
343
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.0K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
50.0K
Nature and Nurture01:10

Nature and Nurture

Many human characteristics, like height, are shaped by both nature—in other words, by our genes—and by nurture, or our environment. For example, chronic stress during childhood inhibits the production of growth hormones and consequently reduces bone growth and height. Scientists estimate that 70-90% of variation in height is due to genetic differences among individuals, and 10-30% of variation in height is due to differences in the environments that individuals experience,...
20.5K