Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
Exploration on the first-line treatment of ERBB2-altered advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter
Jiayan Chen1, Chunwei Xu2, Qian Wang3
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China.
Background:
Although the treatment of ERBB2-altered non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been studied for many years, there are no comprehensive studies to evaluate the benefits of various therapies as first-line treatment. Through the development of immunotherapy, more and more different combination treatments were applicated in clinical practice, therefore, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of different treatments.
Methods:
We enrolled patients with ERBB2-altered NSCLC who had undergone at least one-line systemic anticancer treatment to evaluate the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy alone (Chemo), anti-ERBB2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (Chemo + Immuno), chemotherapy plus anti-angiogenesis therapy (Chemo + Antiangio) and chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy and anti-angiogenesis therapy (Chemo + Immuno + Antiangio). The clinical outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), one-year and three-year survival rate.
Results:
We enroll 36 patients harboring ERBB2 mutation and 29 with ERBB2 amplification. The overall ORR was 30.8%, DCR was 69.2% and mPFS was 5.7 months. Chemo + Immuno and Chemo + Antiangio both achieved longer mPFS than TKI (7.8 vs 3.6 months, HR: 0.24, 95 %CI: 0.09-0.64, P = 0.002; 5.9 vs 3.6 months, HR: 0.36, 95 %CI: 0.15-0.88, P = 0.019; respectively), while there was no significant difference in mPFS between Chemo + Immuno or Chemo + Antiangio and Chemo (both P > 0.05), the mPFS of the first two was longer. For ERBB2-mutant patients, the mPFS was 5.9 months, and Chemo + Immuno and Chemo + Antiangio both achieved longer mPFS than TKI (12.9 vs 2.9 months, HR: 0.15, 95 %CI: 0.03-0.68, P = 0.005; 7.1 vs 2.9 months, HR: 0.50, 95 %CI: 0.29-0.88, P = 0.009, respectively). In the same therapies, patients with ERBB2 mutation or ERBB2 amplification showed no statistical significance in PFS (both P > 0.05).
Conclusions:
In the first-line treatment of ERBB2-altered NSCLC, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy or anti-angiogenesis therapy may have greater survival benefits than ERBB2-target therapy, but the efficacy may not be better than that of chemotherapy.
Insights
First-line treatments for ERBB2-altered non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were evaluated. Combination therapies including immunotherapy or anti-angiogenesis showed improved survival benefits over targeted therapy alone.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Research
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ERBB2 alterations presents unique treatment challenges.
- Existing studies lack comprehensive evaluations of first-line therapies for ERBB2-altered NSCLC.
- Advancements in immunotherapy necessitate a re-evaluation of treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of various first-line treatment regimens for ERBB2-altered NSCLC.
- To compare outcomes between chemotherapy alone, anti-ERBB2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and combination therapies.
- To assess the impact of immunotherapy and anti-angiogenesis on patient survival.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter retrospective study enrolled patients with ERBB2-altered NSCLC.
- Treatment groups included chemotherapy (Chemo), anti-ERBB2 TKI, Chemo + Immunotherapy (Immuno), Chemo + Anti-angiogenesis (Antiangio), and Chemo + Immuno + Antiangio.
- Clinical outcomes assessed were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and median progression-free survival (mPFS).
Main Results:
- The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 30.8% and median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.7 months.
- Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (Chemo + Immuno) and anti-angiogenesis (Chemo + Antiangio) demonstrated longer mPFS compared to TKIs.
- No significant difference in mPFS was observed between combination therapies and chemotherapy alone, though combination therapies showed longer mPFS.
Conclusions:
- First-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy or anti-angiogenesis may offer superior survival benefits compared to ERBB2-targeted therapy alone in ERBB2-altered NSCLC.
- The efficacy of these combination therapies may not surpass that of chemotherapy alone.
- Further research is warranted to optimize first-line treatment strategies for this patient population.
More Related Videos
09:38Establishment and Characterization of Three Afatinib-resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma PC-9 Cell Lines Developed with Increasing Doses of Afatinib
Published on: June 26, 2019
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Treatment Resistant Cancers