Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff
Published on: May 15, 2017
Developing nitrogen removal models for stormwater bioretention systems
Jiayi Li1, Teresa B Culver1, Padmini P Persaud2
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Virginia, 351 McCormick Road, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, United States.
New models improve bioretention system performance by accurately simulating nitrogen removal. These advanced nitrogen removal models (NRMs) better predict effluent concentrations, enhancing stormwater management.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Engineering
- Water Quality Management
- Stormwater Management
Background:
- Bioretention systems reduce runoff volume and remove nitrogen.
- Internal water storage (IWS) and real-time control (RTC) can enhance bioretention performance.
- Existing models struggle to simulate nitrogen transformations influenced by IWS and environmental factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- Develop and evaluate nitrogen removal models (NRMs) for bioretention systems.
- Compare model performance with varying nitrogen cycling complexity (Single Nitrogen Pool vs. 3 Nitrogen Pool) and kinetics (0-order, 1st-order, Michaelis-Menten).
- Assess model adaptability to systems with IWS and RTC, using soil moisture data.
Main Methods:
- Developed six NRMs by combining SP and 3P models with 0-order, 1st-order, and Michaelis-Menten kinetics.
- Calibrated and validated NRMs using laboratory bioretention system data.
- Integrated NRMs with the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) for simulation and comparison.
Main Results:
- 0-order kinetics were unsuitable for simulating nitrogen removal in bioretention systems.
- 1st-order kinetics and Michaelis-Menten models showed similar performance.
- The best model (3P-m) improved prediction accuracy for nitrogen event mean concentrations by 20% compared to SWMM.
- 3P-m accurately predicted cumulative nitrogen mass removal rates (±7% error) for systems with IWS/RTC, outperforming SWMM (-23% error).
Conclusions:
- 3P models offer higher accuracy and better biochemical reaction rate predictions than SP models.
- SP models provide improved accuracy with simpler initial condition requirements.
- The developed 3P-m model enhances the simulation of nitrogen removal in bioretention systems, particularly those with IWS and RTC.
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Mass in Moving, Nondeforming Control Volume
In the context of a detention basin, the conservation of mass states that the total mass of water entering the basin must equal the mass leaving the basin plus any accumulation of...
Bioremediation
Typical Model Studies
Overview of Nitrogen Metabolism
The largest pool of nitrogen available in the terrestrial ecosystem is gaseous nitrogen (N2) from the air, but this...
Inorganic Nitrogen Assimilation
Environmental Applications of Microorganisms

