Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of an automated, imaging-based preoperative screening model for early identification of malnutrition in an abdominal surgery cohort.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Nutritional screening within the GLIM procedure-Part 1: Development of a conceptual definition of risk of malnutrition using a modified Delphi procedure.

JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition·2026
Same author

Nutritional screening within the GLIM procedure-Part 2: Operationalization of the concept risk of malnutrition using a modified Delphi procedure.

JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition·2026
Same author

Fermented food microbiome: influence on oral and gut microbiota, and human health.

Nature reviews. Microbiology·2026
Same author

Guidance for the assessment of the dietary intake and gastrointestinal or nutrition impact symptoms etiologic criterion of Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition: A modified-Delphi study.

JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition·2026
Same author

Glucuronidation metabolomic fingerprinting to map host-microbe metabolism.

Nature communications·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Taste Exam: A Brief and Validated Test
07:10

Taste Exam: A Brief and Validated Test

Published on: August 17, 2018

16.5K

Penn Healthy Diet survey: pilot validation and scoring.

Charlene W Compher1, Ryan Quinn2, Richard Haslam3

  • 1University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

The British Journal of Nutrition
|July 31, 2023
PubMed
Summary

The Penn Healthy Diet (PHD) survey is an easy-to-use tool for assessing diet quality. It shows moderate correlation with the Healthy Eating Index-2015, suggesting its utility in health systems.

Keywords:
ASA24BiobankDietHEI-2015NHANESScoreScreenerSurvey

More Related Videos

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

7.0K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
06:48

Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research

Published on: June 7, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Taste Exam: A Brief and Validated Test
07:10

Taste Exam: A Brief and Validated Test

Published on: August 17, 2018

16.5K
A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

7.0K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
06:48

Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research

Published on: June 7, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Nutrition Science
  • Public Health
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Diet quality is crucial for chronic disease prevention but challenging for health systems to assess efficiently.
  • Existing methods for dietary assessment lack user-friendliness and efficiency for widespread health system application.
  • The Penn Healthy Diet (PHD) survey was developed to address this gap in dietary assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate patient experience and usability of the Penn Healthy Diet (PHD) survey.
  • To validate the accuracy of the PHD by comparing it to diet recall data.
  • To explore and compare different scoring algorithms for the PHD in relation to the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015.

Main Methods:

  • A pilot study surveyed participants from the Penn Health BioBank using the PHD and the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour recall (ASA24).
  • Kappa scores and Spearman correlations were employed to compare related items between the PHD and ASA24.
  • Three distinct scoring algorithms (numerical scoring, regression tree, weighted regressions) were developed and analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Participants found the PHD easy to use and expressed willingness for annual re-administration.
  • The PHD demonstrated strong associations with HEI-2015 scores derived from NHANES 2017-2018 data.
  • The scoring algorithms showed moderate correlations with HEI-2015 scores from the pilot data.

Conclusions:

  • The Penn Healthy Diet (PHD) survey is an acceptable and user-friendly tool for dietary assessment.
  • The PHD shows moderate correlation with the HEI-2015, indicating potential for health system integration.
  • Further validation in larger populations is recommended to refine scoring algorithms and confirm efficacy.